scholarly journals Lost in the Rush to National Reform: Recommendations to Improve Impact on Behavioral Health Providers in Rural Areas

2012 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 842-856 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rafael Semansky ◽  
Cathleen Willging ◽  
David J. Ley ◽  
Barbara Rylko-Bauer
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naim Naim ◽  
Laura Dunlap

BACKGROUND Access to behavioral health services, particularly substance use disorder (SUD) treatment services, is challenging in rural and other underserved areas. Some of the reasons for these challenges include local primary care providers without experience in behavioral health treatment, few specialty providers, and concerns over stigma and lack of privacy for individuals from smaller communities. Telehealth can ease these challenges and support behavioral health, specifically SUD treatment, in a variety of ways, including direct patient care, patient engagement, and provider education. Telehealth is particularly relevant for the growing opioid epidemic, which has profoundly affected rural areas. OBJECTIVE We sought to understand how telehealth is used to support behavioral health and SUDs, with a particular focus on implications for medication-assisted treatment for opioid use disorders. The intent was to understand telehealth implementation and use, financing and sustainability, and impact in the field. The results of this work can be used to inform future policy and practice. METHODS We reviewed literature and interviewed telehealth stakeholders and end users in the field. The team identified a diverse set of participants, including clinical staff, administrators, telehealth coordinators, and information technology staff. We analyzed research notes to extract themes from participant experiences to answer the study questions. RESULTS Organizations varied in how they implemented telehealth services and the services they offered. Common themes arose in implementation, such as planning for technical and organizational impacts of telehealth, the importance of leadership support, and tailoring programs to community needs. CONCLUSIONS Telehealth is used in a variety of ways to expand access to services and extend service delivery. As the policy and reimbursement landscape continues to evolve, there may be corresponding changes in telehealth uptake and services provided. CLINICALTRIAL NA


2021 ◽  
pp. 1-17
Author(s):  
Shelley MacDermid Wadsworth ◽  
David Topp ◽  
Kathy Broniarczyk ◽  
Scott A. Edwards ◽  
David Riggs ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. 855-866 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meagan M Graydon ◽  
Catherine M Corno ◽  
Rebecca L Schacht ◽  
Daniel J Knoblach ◽  
Alicia E Wiprovnick ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 665-668
Author(s):  
Lily A. Brown

Suicide rates among youths in foster care are among the highest in the United States. Despite this fact, many foster-care agencies do not perform universal suicide-risk assessments as part of routine care. This commentary includes an argument for the importance of implementing universal suicide-risk assessments for youths in foster care. Important contextual information that prevents behavioral-health clinicians from implementing universal suicide screenings of youths in foster care is discussed. Several possible strategies for implementing universal suicide-risk assessments are offered; the pros and cons of each strategy are discussed. The perspectives of multiple stakeholders should be included in the consideration of universal suicide screening for youths in foster care, including behavioral-health providers, primary-care doctors, supervisors, directors of agencies, foster parents, and case managers. Although each of these stakeholders can improve suicide prevention, youths in foster care may not have regular access to each stakeholder. Case managers may be the optimal stakeholders for implementing universal suicide screening because of their frequent access to youths in foster care; therefore, case managers should receive training in suicide-risk assessment and prevention strategies.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document