scholarly journals Preschoolers' Precision of the Approximate Number System Predicts Later School Mathematics Performance

PLoS ONE ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 6 (9) ◽  
pp. e23749 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michèle M. M. Mazzocco ◽  
Lisa Feigenson ◽  
Justin Halberda
Author(s):  
Tayyaba Abid ◽  
Saeeda Khanum

The ability to process numbers approximately also called, approximate number system (ANS) is related and predictive of school mathematics performance. This system is functional since birth and continue to become more precise throughout the development. Developmental change of approximate number system over the growing years has not been investigated in Pakistan so the current study bridged this gap by investigating it from 261 participants ranging from 5 to 72 years of age. Panamath task being the robust measure of ANS acuity was administered. Results revealed that numerical acuity got precise with an increase in age. However, most sophisticated acuity has been shown around age 46-50 as compared to the western population showing its peak around 30 years of age. Delay in developing approximate number system acuity across the groups as compared to the trend reported in the western population raises many questions in terms of cultural variations and practices contributing to the development of number sense. The study has important implications for the development of number sense cross-culturally keeping in view the evidence from various cultures.


2017 ◽  
Vol 40 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew Inglis ◽  
Sophie Batchelor ◽  
Camilla Gilmore ◽  
Derrick G. Watson

AbstractLeibovich et al. argue persuasively that researchers should not assume that approximate number system (ANS) tasks harness an innate sense of number. However, some studies have reported a causal link between ANS tasks and mathematics performance, implicating the ANS in the development of numerical skills. Here we report a p-curve analysis, which indicates that these experimental studies do not contain evidential value.


2018 ◽  
Vol 81 (3) ◽  
pp. 621-636 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aaron Cochrane ◽  
Lucy Cui ◽  
Edward M. Hubbard ◽  
C. Shawn Green

2013 ◽  
Vol 55 (12) ◽  
pp. 1109-1114 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kerstin Hellgren ◽  
Justin Halberda ◽  
Lea Forsman ◽  
Ulrika Ådén ◽  
Melissa Libertus

Perception ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 45 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 44-55 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fanny Gimbert ◽  
Edouard Gentaz ◽  
Valérie Camos ◽  
Karine Mazens

2021 ◽  
Vol 44 ◽  
Author(s):  
José Luis Bermúdez

Abstract Against Clarke and Beck's proposal that the approximate number system (ANS) represents natural and rational numbers, I suggest that the experimental evidence is better accommodated by the (much weaker) thesis that the ANS represents cardinality comparisons. Cardinality comparisons do not stand in arithmetical relations and being able to apply them does not involve basic arithmetical concepts and operations.


2021 ◽  
Vol 44 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven Gross ◽  
William Kowalsky ◽  
Tyler Burge

Abstract According to Clarke and Beck (C&B), the approximate number system (ANS) represents numbers. We argue that the ANS represents pure magnitudes. Considerations of explanatory economy favor the pure magnitudes hypothesis. The considerations C&B direct against the pure magnitudes hypothesis do not have force.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document