The Critical Role Of Observational Evidence In Comparative Effectiveness Research

2010 ◽  
Vol 29 (10) ◽  
pp. 1826-1833 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachael L. Fleurence ◽  
Huseyin Naci ◽  
Jeroen P. Jansen
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Effectiveness Research ◽  
Comparative Effectiveness ◽  
Critical Role ◽  
Observational Evidence ◽  
Effectiveness Research

Randomized Controlled Trials and Comparative Effectiveness Research

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (34) ◽  
pp. 4194-4201 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olwen M. Hahn ◽  
Richard L. Schilsky
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Comparative Effectiveness Research ◽  
Comparative Effectiveness ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Health Care Research ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Effectiveness Research ◽  
Randomized Controlled

Comparative effectiveness research (CER) has been promoted as a way to improve the translation gap between clinical research and everyday clinical practice as well as to deliver more cost-effective health care. CER will account for a significant portion of funding allocated by the US government for health care research. Oncology has a rich history of improving clinical outcomes and advancing research through randomized controlled trials (RCTs). In this article, we review the role of RCTs in achieving the goals of CER, with particular emphasis on the role of publicly funded clinical trials.

scholarly journals PRS2 The Role Of RX Data in Comparative Effectiveness Research

2011 ◽  
Vol 14 (7) ◽  
pp. A487
Author(s):  
L. Varasteh ◽  
A. Pedan ◽  
E. Asumeng-Denteh
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Effectiveness Research ◽  
Comparative Effectiveness ◽  
Effectiveness Research
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document