Combinations of Intravenous and Intra-Arterial Thrombolysis

2003 ◽  
pp. 197-208
Author(s):  
Joseph Broderick ◽  
Rashmi Kothari
1994 ◽  
Vol 30 (5) ◽  
pp. 835
Author(s):  
Ki Nam Lee ◽  
Sun Seob Choi ◽  
Yung Il Lee ◽  
Byeong Ho Park ◽  
Jae Ik Kim ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Felix Hadler ◽  
Raveena Singh ◽  
Martin Wiesmann ◽  
Arno Reich ◽  
Omid Nikoubashman

<b><i>Background:</i></b> While endovascular stroke treatment (EST) of large vessel occlusions in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is proven to be safe and effective, there are subgroups of patients with increased rates of hemorrhages. Our goal was to identify risk factors for intracerebral hemorrhage and to assess whether acute carotid artery stenting (CAS) was associated with increased bleeding rates. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We performed a retrospective analysis of our monocentric prospective stroke registry in the period from May 2010 to May 2018 and compared AIS patients receiving EST with (<i>n</i> = 73) versus without acute CAS (<i>n</i> = 548). Patients with intracranial stents, intra-arterial thrombolysis, or dissection of the carotid artery were excluded. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Parenchymal hemorrhage rates (PH2 according to the ECASS classification) and symptomatic hemorrhage (sICH) rates were increased in EST patients receiving CAS with odds being 6.3 (PH2) and 6.5 (sICH) times higher (PH2 17.8 vs. 3.3%, <i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.001 and sICH: 16.4 vs. 2.9%, <i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.001). Additional systemic thrombolysis with rtPA (IVRTPA) was no risk factor for cerebral hemorrhage (<i>p</i> = 0.213). <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> AIS patients receiving EST with acute CAS and consecutive tirofiban or dual antiplatelet therapy suffered from an increased risk of relevant secondary intracranial bleeding. After adjusting for confounders, tirofiban and dual antiplatelet therapy were associated with higher bleeding rates.


Neurosurgery ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 54 (1) ◽  
pp. 218-223 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark R. Harrigan ◽  
Elad I. Levy ◽  
Bernard R. Bendok ◽  
L. Nelson Hopkins

Abstract OBJECTIVE AND IMPORTANCE Intra-arterial thrombolysis has been demonstrated to improve recanalization and outcomes among patients with acute ischemic stroke. However, thrombolytic agents have limited effectiveness and are associated with a significant risk of bleeding. Bivalirudin is a direct thrombin inhibitor that has been demonstrated in the cardiology literature to have a more favorable efficacy and bleeding profile than other antithrombotic medications. We report the use of bivalirudin during endovascular treatment of acute stroke, when hemorrhagic complications are not uncommon. CLINICAL PRESENTATION A 71-year-old woman with atrial fibrillation presented with right hemiparesis and aphasia and was found to have a National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score of 10. Computed tomographic scans revealed no evidence of intracranial hemorrhage, aneurysm, or ischemic stroke. Cerebral angiography revealed thromboembolic occlusion of the superior division of the left middle cerebral artery. INTERVENTION For anticoagulation, a loading dose of bivalirudin was intravenously administered before the interventional procedure, followed by continuous infusion. Attempts to remove the clot with an endovascular snare failed to induce recanalization of the vessel. Bivalirudin was then administered intra-arterially. Immediate postprocedural angiography demonstrated restoration of flow in the left middle cerebral artery. Repeat computed tomographic scans demonstrated no intracranial hemorrhage. The patient's hemiparesis and aphasia were nearly resolved and her National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score was 2 at the time of her discharge 5 days later. CONCLUSION To our knowledge, this is the first report of the use of bivalirudin for treatment of acute ischemic stroke. Bivalirudin may be a useful agent for intravenous anticoagulation and intra-arterial thrombolysis in this setting.


2006 ◽  
Vol 106 (6) ◽  
pp. 679-683 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Van Damme ◽  
G. Trotteui ◽  
A. Kerzmann ◽  
R. Limet

Stroke ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 32 (9) ◽  
pp. 2021-2028 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael H. Lev ◽  
Alan Z. Segal ◽  
Jeffery Farkas ◽  
Syeda T. Hossain ◽  
Christopher Putman ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document