scholarly journals Discomfort, Expectations and Experiences during Treatment of Class II Malocclusion with Clear Block and Twin Block Appliance - A Pilot Survey

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (15) ◽  
pp. 1064-1068
Author(s):  
Navjeet Singh Gurudatta ◽  
Ranjit H. Kamble ◽  
Jimmy K. Sangtani ◽  
Zynul A. John ◽  
Monika M. Ahuja ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Class Ii ◽  
Orthodontic Appliances ◽  
Twin Block ◽  
Skeletal Class ◽  
Skeletal Class Ii ◽  
Dental Aesthetics ◽  
The Face ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Maxilla And Mandible ◽  
Posterior Discrepancy

BACKGROUND Skeletal class II division 1 malocclusion is an antero posterior discrepancy between maxilla and mandible which is usually treated by functional appliances when the patient is in the growing phase. It has been shown that these functional orthodontic appliances may lead to pressure on the oral mucosa, soft tissue tension, oral constriction, toothache and pain. They may also lead to fatigue or to functional speech and respiratory disorders, and they may affect the appearance of the face. All of these undesired consequences affect the patients’ degree of compliance in a negative manner, and may in turn affect the patients’ perception towards the treatment. This study was conducted to investigate patient perception of treatment need, appliance acceptance, expectations of treatment influence on oral health, value of dental aesthetics and information concerning treatment procedures. METHODS Total 30 samples were selected 15 samples were cases treated with twin block appliance and other 15 samples were treated with clear block appliance. After 8 months of treatment, a questionnaire survey was conducted assessing discomfort, expectations and experiences of all patients being treated with clear block appliance and twin block appliance. RESULTS Clear block seemed to be better with regard to all the parameters used in the study but on statistical analysis the difference between the two groups was insignificant. CONCLUSIONS Clear block appliance was designed to increase the compliance of the patient. However, clear block and twin block appliance have similar effects. KEY WORDS Class II, Clear Block, Twin Block

scholarly journals Management of severe Class II malocclusion with sequential modified twin block and fixed orthodontic appliances

2016 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 113-118
Author(s):  
Sonal Chowdhary
Keyword(s):  
Class Ii ◽  
Mandibular Advancement ◽  
Orthodontic Appliances ◽  
Class Ii Malocclusion ◽  
Functional Appliance ◽  
Deep Bite ◽  
Twin Block ◽  
Skeletal Class ◽  
Skeletal Class Ii ◽  
Fixed Orthodontic Appliances

Functional appliance is an effective way of treating skeletal Class II malocclusion in children and adolescents. A 12 months stepwise mandibular advancement protocol with Herbst appliance has been proved to enhance condylar growth and improve mandibular prognathism. The present case report documents a 12-year-old boy presenting with Angle’s Class II, division 1 malocclusion associated with excessive overjet (11 mm), 100% deep bite, and retrognathic mandible. He was treated by a phase I growth modification therapy using twin block appliance with lip pads in a stepwise mandibular advancement protocol followed by a phase II preadjusted Edgewise appliance therapy.

scholarly journals Comparison of the effects of rapid maxillary expansion versus Twin Block appliance on mandibular growth in skeletal Class II patients

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jia-Nan Zhang ◽  
Si Chen ◽  
Cheng-Yi Huang ◽  
Chong Zhong ◽  
Jing Jin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Class Ii ◽  
Rapid Maxillary Expansion ◽  
Maxillary Expansion ◽  
Fixed Appliance ◽  
Mandibular Growth ◽  
Twin Block ◽  
Skeletal Class ◽  
Skeletal Changes ◽  
Skeletal Class Ii ◽  
Growth Changes

Abstract Background This is a retrospective study that compares mandibular growth changes in skeletal Class II patients treated by rapid maxillary expansion (RME) and following fixed appliance with those patients treated by Twin-Block (TB) and following fixed appliance. Methods Fourteen patients treated by RME and following fixed appliance were included into the RME group. Fifteen patients treated by Twin-Block and following fixed appliance were included into the TB group. Lateral cephalometric radiographs taken before treatment and immediately after fixed appliance treatment were used to evaluate mandibular growth effects. Results The starting forms of the patients in the two groups were examined to be of good comparability. The mandibular length increased significantly in both groups as measured by Co-Gn, Go-Gn and Ar-Gn, but the TB group didn’t show more mandibular growth than the RME group (P > 0.05). Skeletal changes of the mandible in vertical dimension were different in the two groups. The change in FMA was 0.35° in the RME group, while the change was 2.65° in the TB group (P < 0.001). The change in LAFH was 5.14 mm in the RME group, significantly smaller than the change of 10.19 mm in the TB group (P < 0.001). Conclusion The investigated Phase I treatment with RME followed by Phase II treatment of fixed appliance achieved the same increases in sagittal mandibular growth and facial profile improvements as the Twin-Block therapy. The treatment with RME followed by fixed appliance was better for vertical control, while the treatment with Twin-Block followed by fixed appliance significantly increased the mandibular plane angle.

Skeletal Class II correction and neuromuscular adaptation with twin-block: A cephalometric and electromyography study in adults

2016 ◽  
Vol 50 (2) ◽  
pp. 94-100
Author(s):  
Sandeep Kumar ◽  
Tulika Tripathi ◽  
Maninder Singh Sidhu ◽  
Puneet Yadav ◽  
Ashish Dabas
Keyword(s):  
Class Ii ◽  
Twin Block ◽  
Skeletal Class ◽  
Neuromuscular Adaptation ◽  
Skeletal Class Ii

scholarly journals Skeletal Class II Malocclusion Treatment with Combined Twin Block and Lip Bumper Appliances: A Case Report

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (Supp. 1) ◽  
pp. 87-94
Author(s):  
Hilda Fitria Lubis ◽  
Nurhayati Harahap ◽  
Ananda Permata Sari
Keyword(s):  
Class Ii ◽  
Class Ii Malocclusion ◽  
Condylar Cartilage ◽  
Lower Lip ◽  
Mandibular Growth ◽  
Twin Block ◽  
Skeletal Class ◽  
Anterior Teeth ◽  
Skeletal Class Ii ◽  
Lip Bumper

Functional appliances have been used over a century in clinical orthodontic treatments for skeletal Class II malocclusion patients. Its popularity is attributed to its high patient adaptability and ability to produce rapid treatment changes. The twin block and lip bumper can be combined depending on the patient’s cases. The purpose of therapy with twin block is effective in mandibular growth deficiencies to induce supplementary lengthening of mandibular by stimulating increased growth at the condylar cartilage. The patient was a ten-year-old male patient with skeletal Class II malocclusion. He had a convex facial profile, SNA (sella, nasion, A point) angle of 77.5°, SNB (sella, nasion, B point) angle of 73.0°, ANB (A point, nasion, B point) angle of 4.5°, overjet of 6.5 mm, overbite of 11/41 = 5.0 mm, 21/31 = 4.5 mm, abnormal upper labial frenulum, crossbite in the second left premolar of maxilla, crowded anterior teeth of mandibular, deficiency of mandibular growth, lower lip sucking habit, anterior teeth of maxilla with diastema and proclination. Orthodontic treatment for patient is a combination of twin block and lip bumper appliances. After seven months, frenectomy is used to eliminate and correct the spacing in the frenulum. After 10 months, the patient’s skeletal and profile had improved to skeletal Class I malocclusion, SNA angle of 78.0°, SNB angle of 75.0°, ANB angle of 3.0°, overbite and overjet of 4.0 mm, and the lower lip sucking habit had stopped. Twin block and lip bumper appliances are particularly good alternative treatment in managing selected cases of skeletal Class II malocclusion.

scholarly journals Twin block appliance: Effect on pharyngeal airway

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 147-152
Author(s):  
Vivek Bikram Thapa ◽  
Amrita Shrestha ◽  
Prabesh Sherchan ◽  
Prakash Poudel ◽  
Luna Joshi
Keyword(s):  
Soft Palate ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Class Ii Malocclusion ◽  
Twin Block ◽  
Skeletal Class ◽  
Pharyngeal Airway ◽  
Skeletal Class Ii ◽  
Obstructive Sleep ◽  
Lateral Cephalograms ◽  
Mandibular Retrusion

Background: Mandibular retrusion is the main cause of Skeletal Class II malocclusion characterized by skeletal retrusion of mandible with skeletal or dentoalveolar protrusion of maxillary. Objectives: This study was conducted to evaluate effect of treatment with twin-block appliances on pharyngeal dimensions. Methodology: This study was conducted in in the Department of Orthodontics & Dentofacial Orthopedics in Kathmandu Medical College. Twenty patients of age group 7 to 14 years with skeletal class II malocclusion with mandibular retrusion were selected. Variables evaluated were depth of nasopharynx; height of nasopharynx; depth of oropharynx; depth of hypopharynx; soft palate length; soft palate thickness and soft palate inclination. The lateral cephalograms were obtained for all subjects before the start of treatment and after a follow-up period of approximately three months in treatment. Results: Results showed that depth of nasopharynx increased by 1 mm, height of nasopharynx increased by 0.78 mm, depth of nasopharynx increased by 1.97 mm, depth of hypopharynx increased by 0.79 mm, soft palate length decreased by 4 mm, soft palate thickness increased by 2 mm and soft palate inclination decreased by 7.01 mm. The results for depth of pharynx and soft palate thickness were statistically significant. Conclusion: This study concluded that the use of twin block appliance for class II patients corrects sagittal dimension of oropharynx and hypopharynx. Early intervention for mandibular retrognathism in class II malocclusion helps enlarge the airway dimensions and decrease potential risk of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome for growing patients in the future.

Skeletal Class II correction and neuromuscular adaptation with twin-block: A cephalometric and electromyography study in adults

2016 ◽  
Vol 50 (2) ◽  
pp. 94-100
Author(s):  
Sandeep Kumar ◽  
Tulika Tripathi ◽  
Maninder Singh Sidhu ◽  
Puneet Yadav ◽  
Ashish Dabas
Keyword(s):  
Class Ii ◽  
Twin Block ◽  
Skeletal Class ◽  
Neuromuscular Adaptation ◽  
Skeletal Class Ii
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document