Is Small Bowel Preparation for Video Capsule Endoscopy (VCE) Necessary? A Single-Center Retrospective Study

2015 ◽  
Vol 110 ◽  
pp. S647 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carmine Catalano ◽  
Rafael A. Ching Companioni ◽  
Melik Tiba ◽  
Pouya Khankhanian ◽  
Aaron Walfish
2006 ◽  
Vol 101 ◽  
pp. S519
Author(s):  
Shabana F. Pasha ◽  
Virender K. Sharma ◽  
Elizabeth J. Carey ◽  
Amy K. Hara ◽  
Arthur D. Shiff ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 105 ◽  
pp. S88
Author(s):  
Dhavan Parikh ◽  
Mohit Mittal ◽  
Amar Al-Juburi ◽  
Juan Garcia ◽  
Surinder Mann

2020 ◽  
Vol 53 (6) ◽  
pp. 713-718 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas Placone ◽  
Runalia Bahar ◽  
Surinder Mann

2013 ◽  
Vol 29 (8) ◽  
pp. 931-945 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elisabeth Mathus-Vliegen ◽  
Maria Pellisé ◽  
Denis Heresbach ◽  
Wolfgang Fischbach ◽  
Tricia Dixon ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 64 (6) ◽  
pp. 1114-1117 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carmine Catalano ◽  
Rafael Antonio Ching Companioni ◽  
Pouya Khankhanian ◽  
Neil Vyas ◽  
Ishan Patel ◽  
...  

There is no standardized protocol for bowel preparation prior to video capsule endoscopy, although one is strongly recommended. The purpose of our study was to see if there was a statistical significance between small bowel mucosal visualization rates for those who received bowel preparation and those who did not. We retrospectively analyzed all patients who had a video capsule endoscopy from August 2014 to January 2016 at a tertiary care center. All patients fasted prior to the procedure. Bowel preparation when used consisted of polyethylene glycol. A long fast consisted of 12 or more hours. The grading system used to assess the small bowel was adapted from a previously validated system from Esaki et al. Statistical analyses were performed using Fisher's exact test or Welch's 2-sample t-test and statistical significance was present if the p value was ≤0.05. 76 patients were carried forward for analysis. Small bowel mucosal visualization rates were similar between those who received bowel preparation and those who did not (92.5% vs 88.9%, p=0.44). Small bowel mucosal visualization rates were significantly better in those patients who had a long fast compared with those who had a short fast (97.7% vs 81.3%, p=0.019). Our study demonstrates that the addition of bowel preparation prior to video capsule endoscopy does not significantly improve small bowel mucosal visualization rates and, in addition, there is a statistically significant relationship between increased fasting time and improved small bowel mucosal visualization. A prolonged fast without bowel preparation might be satisfactory for an adequate small bowel visualization but further randomized, prospective studies are necessary to confirm these findings.


2012 ◽  
Vol 28 (12) ◽  
pp. 1883-1890 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan Belsey ◽  
Cristiano Crosta ◽  
Owen Epstein ◽  
Wolfgang Fischbach ◽  
Peter Layer ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document