scholarly journals S1939 A Rare Case of Prolonged Esophageal Food Impaction Causing Cardiac Arrhythmia

2020 ◽  
Vol 115 (1) ◽  
pp. S1009-S1010
Author(s):  
Zurain Niaz ◽  
Sarah Ali ◽  
Harris Siddiqui ◽  
Abdul Swied
Author(s):  
Luke Hillman ◽  
Sarah Donohue ◽  
Aimee Teo Broman ◽  
Patrick Hoversten ◽  
Eric Gaumnitz ◽  
...  

Summary Esophageal food impaction (EFI) is often the first presentation for patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE); however, there is significant heterogeneity in the management of EFI. We aimed to study the impact of EFI management, particularly post-EFI medication prescriptions on EoE diagnosis, follow-up, and recurrence in patients with endoscopic features of EoE. In our retrospective study, adults presenting between 2007 and 2017 with EFI requiring endoscopic dis-impaction with endoscopic features of EoE (furrows, rings, and/or exudates) were included. We examined the impact of demographics and EFI management on EoE diagnosis, follow-up (esophagogastroduodenoscopy [EGD] or clinic visit within 6 months), and recurrence. We identified 164 cases of EFI due to suspected EoE. Biopsy was performed in 68 patients (41.5%), and 144 patients (87.8%) were placed on proton pump inhibitor (PPI) and/or swallow corticosteroids after EFI, including 88.5% of those not biopsied. PPI use at time of biopsy was negatively associated with EoE diagnosis (odds ratio: 0.39, confidence interval: 0.17–0.85). Sixty-one (37.4%) patients were lost to follow-up at 6 months. Recurrent EFI at 1 year occurred in 3.7% of patients. Medications, most commonly PPI, are frequently prescribed after EFI when the endoscopic features of EoE are present, which may mask the diagnosis of EoE on follow-up EGD. We estimated that for every five patients biopsied on PPI, one case of EoE is masked. As recurrent EFI within 1 year is uncommon, empiric therapy should be avoided until diagnostic biopsies are obtained. Further efforts to reduce loss to follow-up after EFI are also needed.


2019 ◽  
Vol 114 (1) ◽  
pp. S230-S231
Author(s):  
Dhineshreddy Gurala ◽  
Jobin Philipose ◽  
Abhishek Polavarapu ◽  
Vivek Gumaste

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 173-178
Author(s):  
Dhineshreddy Gurala ◽  
Abhishek Polavarapu ◽  
Jobin Philipose ◽  
Shivantha Amarnath ◽  
Akshay Avula ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 2050313X1877473
Author(s):  
Lauren Stemboroski ◽  
Ronald Brown ◽  
Keyrillos Rizg ◽  
James S Scolapio ◽  
Miguel Malespin ◽  
...  

Most esophageal food impactions either pass spontaneously or are treated endoscopically. Severe food impactions can require extensive endoscopic therapy that potentially could lead to procedure-related complications. There are few alternate therapies available when endoscopy fails. Traditionally, pharmacologic therapy with glucagon has been performed with varying success. This case report and discussion will outline the management of a complete food impaction and medical therapies available when first-line endoscopic treatment fails. We present a case in which the endoscopic intervention for esophageal food bolus impaction was unsuccessful.


2019 ◽  
Vol 53 (3) ◽  
pp. 179-183 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jose Melendez-Rosado ◽  
Juan E. Corral ◽  
Sheetal Patel ◽  
Raul J. Badillo ◽  
Dawn Francis

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 548-556 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel A Schupack ◽  
Charles J Lenz ◽  
Debra M Geno ◽  
Crystal J Tholen ◽  
Cadman L Leggett ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document