Effects of Intensive Mathematics Intervention Implemented by a Professional Teacher on Multiplication and Division Performances of Students with Mathematics Difficulties

2021 ◽  
Vol 37 (2) ◽  
pp. 93-121
2011 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 59-70
Author(s):  
Julamas Jansrisukot ◽  
Dr.Unchalee Sanrattana ◽  
Dr.Wallapha Areeratana ◽  
Somporn Warnset

2008 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 20-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diane Pedrotty Bryant ◽  
Brian R. Bryant ◽  
Russell Gersten ◽  
Nancy Scammacca ◽  
Melissa M. Chavez

2017 ◽  
Vol 40 (2) ◽  
pp. 91-104 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa L. Morin ◽  
Silvana M. R. Watson ◽  
Peggy Hester ◽  
Sharon Raver

2016 ◽  
Vol 49 (2) ◽  
pp. 96-105 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara Dougherty ◽  
Diane Pedrotty Bryant ◽  
Brian R. Bryant ◽  
Mikyung Shin

2021 ◽  
pp. 001440292110508
Author(s):  
Gena Nelson ◽  
Soyoung Park ◽  
Tasia Brafford ◽  
Nicole A. Heller ◽  
Angela R. Crawford ◽  
...  

Researchers and practitioners alike often look to meta-analyses to identify effective practices to use with students with disabilities. The number of meta-analyses in special education has also expanded in recent years. The purpose of this systematic review is to evaluate the quality of reporting in meta-analyses focused on mathematics interventions for students with or at risk of disabilities. We applied 53 quality indicators (QIs) across eight categories based on recommendations from Talbott et al. to 22 mathematics intervention meta-analyses published between 2000 and 2020. Overall, the meta-analyses met 61% of QIs and results indicated that meta-analyses most frequently met QIs related to providing a clear purpose (95%) and data analysis plan (77%), whereas meta-analyses typically met fewer QIs related to describing participants (39%) and explaining the abstract screening process (48%). We discuss the variation in quality indicator scores within and across the quality categories and provide recommendations for future researchers.


2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Siphokazi Kwatubana ◽  
Velaphi Aaron Nhlapo ◽  
Nomsa Moteetee

PurposeSchool principals are presumed to be pillars of school health promotion implementation. Their understanding of their role could enhance school health promotion. This study aims to investigate how principals understood their role in school health promotion.Design/methodology/approachIn this study, semi-structured interviews were conducted with six school principals who participated and completed the first cycle of the Continuous Professional Teacher Development programme that was offered by the South African Council of Educators. Snowball sampling was used to sample participants.FindingsThe findings of this study showed that principals did not differentiate between concepts of health-promoting schools and school health promotion, the meaning was the same for them. They focused on any health improvement within the schools, regardless of its conceptual nature. The second finding pertains to the role of the principal as a manager, while the third was on expedition of collaborations and partnerships.Research limitations/implicationsThis research was limited to school principals who completed the Continuous Professional Teacher Development programme. It, therefore, does not include perceptions of other principals.Originality/valueThe study findings suggest that despite inability of schools in poor communities to implement effective school health programmes, the principals of the sampled schools were aware of their roles. This is positive, as the efforts to enhance health promotion initiatives would focus on developing and empowering principals to improve their performance.


Author(s):  
James D. Stocker ◽  
Rachel Schwartz ◽  
Richard M. Kubina ◽  
Douglas Kostewicz ◽  
Martin Kozloff

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document