scholarly journals A Study on the Rational Application of Valuation for Unlisted Stock

2014 ◽  
Vol 12 (10) ◽  
pp. 179-189
Author(s):  
Heung-Su Kim
Keyword(s):  
Author(s):  
O.N. DIACHKOVA ◽  
◽  
Yu.I. TILININ ◽  
V.A. RATUSHIN ◽  
◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 118 ◽  
pp. 103959
Author(s):  
Jingxian Yang ◽  
Wei She ◽  
Wenqiang Zuo ◽  
Kai lyu ◽  
Qunchao Zhang

2019 ◽  
pp. 159-196
Author(s):  
Matthias Klatt

This chapter presents a normative defense of proportionality’s absolute validity, arguing that proportionality is one of the central rules that establish the space of reasons. Proportionality enables the construction of a justified and well-founded basis for the rational application of human rights. The normative basis of proportionality lies in a moral right to justification. To explore this idea, the chapter begins by explaining the meaning of a right to justification. Next, it explores how it relates to the proportionality test. Building upon the distinction between internal and external justification of rights reasoning, it also addresses the universality problem that consists in doubts about the global validity of the right to justification. It defends the international and transnational validity of the right to justification against claims to cultural relativity by discussing the application of human rights. This, in turn, allows a defense of Forst’s right to justification as a robust fundament of discursive global constitutionalism.


2021 ◽  
pp. 175-189
Author(s):  
Robert Alexy

One of the main theses of principles theory is that the rational application of constitutional rights presupposes proportionality analysis and that proportionality analysis necessarily includes balancing. The objection of over-constitutionalization has been raised to this thesis. Principles theory has attempted to reply to this objection with a theory of discretion in which formal principles, in particular, the principle of democracy, play a pivotal role. The theory of formal principles, however, has led in recent decades to more questions than answers. With respect to constitutional rights, two models have been and remain in competition: the combination model and the separation model. The first model balances formal principles in combination with substantive principles, whereas the second model separates the balancing of formal principles from the balancing of substantive principles. It is argued in this chapter that both models are mistaken, and an epistemic model is proposed that finds expression in the epistemic variables of the Weight Formula.


2018 ◽  
Vol 224 ◽  
pp. 01061
Author(s):  
Vitalii Krutsilo ◽  
Nina Papsheva ◽  
Olga Akushskaya

The paper presents data on the research of influence of various methods of hardening on physico- mechanical characteristics of surface layer and performance indicators of details from heatproof, difficult-to-cut steels and titanium alloys working in extreme conditions.


2019 ◽  
Vol 63 (8) ◽  
pp. 1037-1047 ◽  
Author(s):  
Markus Heim ◽  
Frederick Schneider ◽  
Haitham Mutlak ◽  
Christian M. Schulz ◽  
Thomas Hachenberg ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document