scholarly journals Enhanced TCP Westwood Slow Start Phase

Author(s):  
Mohanad Al-Hasanat ◽  
Kamaruzzaman Seman ◽  
Kamarudien Saadan
Keyword(s):  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. 4784-4789

Transmission control protocol faces a problem of packet loss differentiation in the wireless and mobile adhoc network. Congestion control is not properly done here. It cannot manage the congestion window as per type of loss and it reduces Congestion window unnecessarily and that degrades the performance. TCP Westwood cannot identify congestion or link failure loss, and it cannot manage the congestion window as per available bandwidth. This paper discusses that TCP Westwood performs bandwidth estimation, setting up a congestion window and a slow start threshold. In mobile adhoc network, link failure may happen frequently, and it should be handled properly. Link failure can be detected with the help of retransmission timeout. Once timeout occurs Westwood performs congestion avoidance. Proposed Westwood manages three states of congestion 1) Avoidance 2) congestion and 3) No congestion, it updates congestion window and slow start threshold as per the status of network. It maintains congestion window dynamically. Network status is identified by estimated bandwidth and proportionality ratio. Proposed method is tested on NS2.35 and compared with the existing TCP variants. The proposed Westwood performs optimized link utilization and congestion control mechanism. Hence it gives significant performance for loss recovery.


2005 ◽  
Vol 39 (8) ◽  
pp. 10
Author(s):  
PATRICE WENDLING
Keyword(s):  

2009 ◽  
Vol 40 (10) ◽  
pp. 1-22
Author(s):  
DOUG BRUNK
Keyword(s):  

2011 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-48
Author(s):  
Asmir Gogic ◽  
Nermin Suljanovic ◽  
Amer Hasanovic ◽  
Aljo Mujcic
Keyword(s):  

2001 ◽  
Vol 53 (3) ◽  
pp. 463-498 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Henry Cox

This article seeks to explain why Denmark and the Netherlands made dramatic progress reforming their welfare systems in the 1990s and why Germany had a relatively slow start. Some possible explanations found to be incomplete are institutional differences in welfare programs, the uniqueness of circumstances (for example, German unification), and the balance of political power in governing institutions. An important part of the puzzle is an increasing perception of the need to reform that was more widespread in Denmark and the Netherlands. The social construction of an imperative to reform in these countries generated a political consensus that was elusive in Germany but that may be developing under Gerhard Schroder's government.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document