scholarly journals Monism in Aristotle’s Metaphysics I.3–5

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Kjeller Johansen
Keyword(s):  
Aristotle's Metaphysics

Scholars have often seen Parmenides as entirely opposed to earlier materialistic philosophy. In this paper I argue that what is more striking in Aristotle’s Metaphysics Book I is the degree of continuity that he sees between Parmenides and the material monists. I explore this coupling of Parmenides with the material monists to understand better what he takes to be distinctive and problematic with Parmenides’ monism.

scholarly journals The Argument of Aristotle's Metaphysics.

1907 ◽  
Vol 4 (7) ◽  
pp. 186
Author(s):  
G. Santayana ◽  
Edith Henry Johnson
Keyword(s):  
Aristotle's Metaphysics

scholarly journals Being, Substance and Form in Aristotle’s Metaphysics

2019 ◽  
pp. 43-52
Author(s):  
Md Abdul Muhit
Keyword(s):  
Primary Mode ◽  
Mode Of Being ◽  
First Philosophy ◽  
Aristotle's Metaphysics

The concepts of ‘being‘, ‘substance‘ and ‘form‘ are central to Aristotle‘s metaphysics. According to him, there are different modes of being, and of all these different modes of being, substance is the primary mode of being, and First Philosophy is especially concerned with the mode of being which belongs to substances. Again, he tries to give an analysis of what a substance is in terms of the concept of form, and claims that it is essence or form that may be called substance in the truest and fullest sense. Thus we see that the concepts of ‘being‘, ‘substance‘ and ‘form‘ are intimately related. This paper is an attempt to analyze clearly what Aristotle means by these three important concepts. Philosophy and Progress, Vol#61-62; No#1-2; Jan-Dec 2017 P 43-52

scholarly journals Ibn Sīnā’s Aristotle

2018 ◽  
pp. 129
Author(s):  
Jules JANSSENS
Keyword(s):  
Ibn Sina ◽  
Arabic Translation ◽  
Aristotle's Metaphysics

Ibn Sīnā’s reading of Aristotle is that of an Arabic and Neoplatonized Aristotle, but, above all, critical, as the two commentaries of his Kitāb al-Insāf, i.e., on Lambda 6-10 and the pseudo-Theology, show. Ibn Sīnā read Aristotle’s works only in Arabic translation and was therefore influenced by their very wording. However, as his commentary on Lambda 6-10 shows, he looked at different translations, or even indirect testimonies, as e.g. Themistius’ paraphrase. Moreover, Ibn Sīnā offers a Neoplatonic inspired interpretation of Aristotle’s metaphysics, especially its theology. Such Neoplatonic reading is almost natural if one, as he does, considers the Theology, which mainly offers a paraphrase of Plotinus’ Enneads IV-VI, as a genuine Aristotelian work, even if Ibn Sīnā suspects a manipulation of the text by dishonest people, in all likelihood some Isma‘ilites. Eventually, Ibn Sīnā, despite his great reference for Aristotle, detects some flaws in the latter’s thinking, or, at least, in its very wording. All in all, Ibn Sīnā reveals to be a critical commentator, who considered Aristotle as the father, or even Godfather, of philosophy, but who nevertheless placed the search for truth above all.

scholarly journals Sobre los sentidos de la ousía en las Categorías y la Metafísica de Aristóteles

2020 ◽  
pp. 75-96
Author(s):  
Lucero González Suárez
Keyword(s):  
Costa Rica ◽  
Palabras Clave ◽  
Aristotle's Metaphysics

Resumen Partiendo del reconocimiento y de la dificultad que supone la comprensión de la noción ousía, esta reflexión busca explicitar los sentidos que la misma adquiere tanto en las Categorías como en la Metafísica. La finalidad última es explicar que la aparente contradicción provocada por el hecho de que en las Categorías Aristóteles sostiene que la proté ousía es el individuo (sýnolon), mientras que en la Metafísica dice que es el eîdos, se resuelve al entender que éste último no es una forma abstracta sino el principio de determinación del compuesto individual. Palabras clave Aristóteles, Metafísica, ousía, eîdos, sýnolon. Referencias Aguirre, Javier, “La forma aristotélica y la solución de las aporías del libro beta”. En Eidos, no. 12 (2010): 158-200. Aristóteles, “Categorías”. En Tratados de Lógica I. Tr. Miguel Candel. Madrid: Gredos, 1994. Aristóteles, Física. Trad. Ute Schmidt. México: UNAM, 2001. Aristóteles, “Tópicos”, en Tratados de Lógica I. Tr. Miguel Candel. Madrid: Gredos, 1994. Aristóteles, Metafísica. Trad. Tomás Calvo Martínez. Madrid: Gredos, 1994. Aubenque, Pierre, El problema del ser en Aristóteles. Tr. Vidal Peña. Madrid: Taurus, 1974. https://es.scribd.com/doc/33765875/Aubenque-Pierre-El-Problema-Del-Ser-en-Aristoteles Bacon, Francis, Novum Organon. Tr. Cristóbal Litrán. Madrid: Sarpe, 1984. Brentano, Franz, Sobre los múltiples significados del ente según Aristóteles. Tr. Manuel Abella. Madrid: Ediciones Encuentro, 2007. Carvajal, J., “El problema de la sustancia en la “Metafísica” de Aristóteles”. En Anales del Seminario de Metafísica. Núm. Extra. Homenaje a S. Rábade (1992): 889-918. González, Lucero, “La doctrina de Tomás de Aquino sobre la analogía como recurso para el conocimiento natural de Dios. Una meditación filosófica sobre sus límites y alcances”. En Revista Perseitas, vol. 3, no. 2 (2015): 154-174. Hamelin, Octave, Le sistéme d’Aristote. París: Vrin, 1976. https://archive.org/details/lesystmedarist00hame/page/n5 Heidegger, Martin, El ser y el tiempo. Tr. J. Gaos. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica, 1988. Heidegger, Martin, “Sobre la esencia y el concepto de Physis. Aristóteles, Física B 1”. En Hitos. Tr. H. Cortés y A. Leyte. Madrid: Alianza, 2000. Mié, Fabián, “La prioridad de la substancia en la primera metafísica de Aristóteles”. En Crítica. Revista Hispanoamericana de Filosofía, vol. 35, no. 103 (2003): 83-120. Oñate, Teresa, Para leer la Metafísica de Aristóteles en el siglo XXI. Madrid: Dykinson, 2001. Owens, Joseph, “La forma aristotélica como causa del ser”. Tr. A. Manero y G. Ituarte. En Revista de Filosofía. Universidad Iberoamericana, año X, Números 29-30 (1977): 267-288. Reale, Giovanni, Introducción a Aristóteles. Tr.Víctor Bazterrica. Barcelona: Herder, 1985. Ross, David, Aristotle’s Metaphysics. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997. Salas, Mario, “Santo Tomas: analogía y participación”. En Revista Filosofía. Universidad de Costa Rica XLI, no. 104 (2003): 153-164. Tomás de Aquino, Suma Teológica I. Tr. Francisco Barbado Viejo. Madrid: Biblioteca de Autores Cristianos, 2014. Zubiri, Xavier. Sobre la esencia, Madrid: Alianza, 1963. file:///C:/Users/Lucero%20 Gonzalez/Downloads/kupdf.net_xavier-zubiri-sobre-la-esenciapdf.pdf

scholarly journals Aristotle’s Metaphysics V 7 Revisited

Apeiron ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
pp. 1-20
Author(s):  
Sebastian Weiner
Keyword(s):  
Aristotle's Metaphysics
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document