Greedy algorithm for image quality optimisation based on turtle-shell steganography

Author(s):  
Guo Hua Qiu ◽  
Chin Feng Lee ◽  
Chin Chen Chang
2013 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 86-94 ◽  
Author(s):  
Devang Odedra ◽  
Joerg Blobel ◽  
Saad AlHumayyd ◽  
Miranda Durand ◽  
Laura Jimenez-Juan ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 118 ◽  
pp. 130-137
Author(s):  
Ali Mohammed Ali ◽  
Peter Hogg ◽  
Mohamed Abuzaid ◽  
Andrew England

2005 ◽  
Vol 114 (1-3) ◽  
pp. 269-272 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Doyle ◽  
C. J. Martin ◽  
D. Gentle

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
L Tribuna ◽  
A Clemente ◽  
T Teixeira ◽  
P Sa Couto ◽  
P Oliveira ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 276
Author(s):  
German Tirao ◽  
Clara Quintana ◽  
Mauro Valente

Author(s):  
F. A. Heckman ◽  
E. Redman ◽  
J.E. Connolly

In our initial publication on this subject1) we reported results demonstrating that contrast is the most important factor in producing the high image quality required for reliable image analysis. We also listed the factors which enhance contrast in order of the experimentally determined magnitude of their effect. The two most powerful factors affecting image contrast attainable with sheet film are beam intensity and KV. At that time we had only qualitative evidence for the ranking of enhancing factors. Later we carried out the densitometric measurements which led to the results outlined below.Meaningful evaluations of the cause-effect relationships among the considerable number of variables in preparing EM negatives depend on doing things in a systematic way, varying only one parameter at a time. Unless otherwise noted, we adhered to the following procedure evolved during our comprehensive study:Philips EM-300; 30μ objective aperature; magnification 7000- 12000X, exposure time 1 second, anti-contamination device operating.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document