Emergency Department Sepsis Care: Could It Matter Who Is in the Ambulance?

2018 ◽  
Vol 15 (12) ◽  
pp. 1398-1400
Author(s):  
Matthew E. Prekker ◽  
Michael A. Puskarich
2018 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 490-497 ◽  
Author(s):  
Margaret B. Greenwood‐Ericksen ◽  
Craig Rothenberg ◽  
Nicholas Mohr ◽  
Shawn D. Andrea ◽  
Todd Slesinger ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 706-706
Author(s):  
Amanda Holyk ◽  
Susan Maynard ◽  
Sameer Sinha ◽  
Brian Newcomb

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. i
Author(s):  
Jack Perkins ◽  
Michael E. Winters

2015 ◽  
Vol 24 (12) ◽  
pp. 787-795 ◽  
Author(s):  
Medley O'Keefe Gatewood ◽  
Matthew Wemple ◽  
Sheryl Greco ◽  
Patricia A Kritek ◽  
Raghu Durvasula

2016 ◽  
Vol 44 (12) ◽  
pp. 428-428
Author(s):  
Ashlee Steger ◽  
Anne Pedersen ◽  
Emily Shears ◽  
Lisa Hurst ◽  
Kim Raines

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andy Hung-Yi Lee ◽  
Emily Aaronson ◽  
Kathryn A Hibbert ◽  
Micah H Flynn ◽  
Hayley Rutkey ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND Sepsis is the leading cause of death in US hospitals. Compliance with bundled care, specifically serial lactates, blood cultures, and antibiotics, improves outcomes but is often delayed or missed altogether in a busy practice environment. OBJECTIVE This study aims to design, implement, and validate a novel monitoring and alerting platform that provides real-time feedback to frontline emergency department (ED) providers regarding adherence to bundled care. METHODS This single-center, prospective, observational study was conducted in three phases: the design and technical development phase to build an initial version of the platform; the pilot phase to test and refine the platform in the clinical setting; and the postpilot rollout phase to fully implement the study intervention. RESULTS During the design and technical development, study team members and stakeholders identified the criteria for patient inclusion, selected bundle measures from the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Sepsis Core Measure for alerting, and defined alert thresholds, message content, delivery mechanisms, and recipients. Additional refinements were made based on 70 provider survey results during the pilot phase, including removing alerts for vasopressor initiation and modifying text in the pages to facilitate patient identification. During the 48 days of the postpilot rollout phase, 15,770 ED encounters were tracked and 711 patient encounters were included in the active monitoring cohort. In total, 634 pages were sent at a rate of 0.98 per attending physician shift. Overall, 38.3% (272/711) patients had at least one page. The missing bundle elements that triggered alerts included: antibiotics 41.6% (136/327), repeat lactate 32.4% (106/327), blood cultures 20.8% (68/327), and initial lactate 5.2% (17/327). Of the missing Sepsis Core Measures elements for which a page was sent, 38.2% (125/327) were successfully completed on time. CONCLUSIONS A real-time sepsis care monitoring and alerting platform was created for the ED environment. The high proportion of patients with at least one alert suggested the significant potential for such a platform to improve care, whereas the overall number of alerts per clinician suggested a low risk of alarm fatigue. The study intervention warrants a more rigorous evaluation to ensure that the added alerts lead to better outcomes for patients with sepsis.


2017 ◽  
Vol 43 (6) ◽  
pp. 532-538 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth R. Tedesco ◽  
Kimberly Whiteman ◽  
Melanie Heuston ◽  
Brenda Swanson-Biearman ◽  
Kimberly Stephens

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document