4. A “Plague of Criminal Abortions” Fertility Control and the Consolidation of Medical Authority

2020 ◽  
pp. 106-126
2020 ◽  
Vol 64 (2) ◽  
pp. 195-218 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Kelly

The twentieth-century history of men and women’s attempts to gain access to reproductive health services in the Republic of Ireland has been significantly shaped by Ireland’s social and religious context. Although contraception was illegal in Ireland from 1935 to 1979, declining family sizes in this period suggest that many Irish men and women were practising fertility control measures. From the mid-1960s, the contraceptive pill was marketed in Ireland as a ‘cycle regulator’. In order to obtain a prescription for the pill, Irish women would therefore complain to their doctors that they had heavy periods or irregular cycles. However, doing so could mean going against one’s faith, and also depended on finding a sympathetic doctor. The contraceptive pill was heavily prescribed in Ireland during the 1960s and 1970s as it was the only contraceptive available legally, albeit prescribed through ‘coded language’. The pill was critiqued by men and women on both sides of the debate over the legalisation of contraception. Anti-contraception activists argued that the contraceptive pill was an abortifacient, while both anti-contraception activists and feminist campaigners alike drew attention to its perceived health risks. As well as outlining these discussions, the paper also illustrates the importance of medical authority in the era prior to legalisation, and the significance of doctors’ voices in relation to debates around the contraceptive pill. However, in spite of medical authority, it is clear that Irish women exercised significant agency in gaining access to the pill.


1972 ◽  
Vol 70 (3) ◽  
pp. 582-590
Author(s):  
B. K. Davis ◽  
I. Noske ◽  
M. C. Chang

ABSTRACT Ethinyloestradiol (EO) fed for various periods before mating to female hamsters affected the timing of mating and pregnancy rate. Slight effects on ovulation, foetal-crown rump length and resorption may have occurred, but effects on implantation were not apparent among pregnant hamsters. The response observed depended upon the feeding schedule adopted: hamsters fed 2.5 mg EO in a single dose, on day 3 before mating, mated normally but had a significantly lower pregnancy rate; on the other hand, animals fed 2.5 mg EO (0.21 mg/day) over three oestrous cycles, days 14–3 before mating, showed variations in the time of mating but had an essentially normal pregnancy rate; and, a group of hamsters who received the same total amount of EO (0.63 mg/day) over one oestrous cycle, days 6–3 premating, showed untowards effects by the steroid on both the timing of mating and pregnancy rate. The implications of these results are considered in relation to fertility control.


1960 ◽  
Vol 34 (2_Suppla) ◽  
pp. S135-S138 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregory Pincus
Keyword(s):  

Reproduction ◽  
1971 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 305-a-305
Author(s):  
K. Virkar ◽  
S. Kora ◽  
S. Dikshit ◽  
M. Lodaya

1988 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 137-142 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bron B. Ingoldsby ◽  
Max E. Stanton
Keyword(s):  

1992 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
pp. 323-332 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saraswati Raju ◽  
Satish Kumar
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Jay V. Gedir ◽  
James W. Cain ◽  
Bruce C. Lubow ◽  
Talesha Karish ◽  
David K. Delaney ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

1976 ◽  
Vol 124 (5) ◽  
pp. 495-498 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Bygdeman ◽  
J.N. Martin ◽  
P. Eneroth ◽  
A. Leader ◽  
V. Lundström

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document