Pre-Cueing, Early Vision, and Cognitive Penetrability

2019 ◽  
pp. 217-234
Author(s):  
Athanassios Raftopoulos
1999 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 394-395
Author(s):  
Philippe G. Schyns

Pylyshyn acknowledges that cognition intervenes in determining the nature of perception when attention is allocated to locations or properties prior to the operation of early vision. I present evidence that scale perception (one function of early vision) is cognitively penetrable and argue that Pylyshyn's criterion covers not a few, but many situations of recognition. Cognitive penetrability could be their modus operandi.


1996 ◽  
Vol 41 (6) ◽  
pp. 617-617
Author(s):  
Mark McCourt
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ambroos Brouwer ◽  
Xuxi Jin ◽  
Aisha Humaira Waldi ◽  
Steven Verheyen

AbstractOlder participants who are briefly presented with the ‘my wife/mother-in-law’ ambiguous figure estimate its age to be higher than young participants do. This finding is thought to be the result of a subconscious social group bias that influences participants’ perception of the figure. Because people are better able to recognize similarly aged individuals, young participants are expected to perceive the ambiguous figure as a young woman, while older participants are more likely to recognize an older lady. We replicate the difference in age estimates, but find no relationship between participants’ age and their perception of the ambiguous figure. This leads us to conclude that the positive relationship between participants’ age and their age estimates of the ambiguous ‘my wife/mother-in-law’ figure is better explained by the own-age anchor effect, which holds that people use their own age as a yard stick to judge the age of the figure, regardless of whether the young woman or the older lady is perceived. Our results disqualify the original finding as an example of cognitive penetrability: the participants’ age biases their judgment of the ambiguous figure, not its perception.


2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. 311-313 ◽  
Author(s):  
MR Shah ◽  
MA Culp ◽  
KR Gersing ◽  
PL Jones ◽  
ME Purucker ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 43 (8) ◽  
pp. 1063-1079 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jorge Fernández-Berni ◽  
Ricardo Carmona-Galán ◽  
Rocío del Río ◽  
Angel Rodríguez-Vázquez

1994 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 83-90 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kerry W. Kilborn ◽  
Angela D. Friederici

2000 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 83-89 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert G. Cook

How do small-brained, highly mobile animals like birds so readily perceive the visual world? Despite the computational complexity of vision, recent behavioral tests have suggested that these evolutionarily distant animals may use visual mechanisms that operate in the same manner as the visual mechanisms of primates. This article reviews new evidence regarding the processes of early vision and object perception in pigeons and considers speculations about the similarities and differences between avian and primate visual cognition.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document