6 Hieroi Logoi in 24 Rhapsodies

2020 ◽  
pp. 274-350
Keyword(s):  
2014 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 97-116
Author(s):  
Janet Downie

Abstract Most ancient evidence for divinatory dreams elides the hermeneutic process. However, the two most expansive literary sources on ancient dreaming, both from the second century CE, focus attention on precisely that issue. Artemidorus’ Oneirocritica and Aelius Aristides’ Hieroi Logoi have very different aims, but both writers grapple with the hermeneutic challenges that dreams pose, and both attribute these challenges to dreams’ narrative quality. Artemidorus views the narrative complexity of dreams as an impediment to interpretation. In his technical treatise, therefore, he distills dream visions to their symbolic elements, and offers guidance on correlating those with the dreamer’s personal narrative. Aristides, by contrast, revels in the narrative abundance of divine dreams. The stories they tell allow him to claim divine endorsement for his self-portrait. For both Aristides and Artemidorus- to different effect in each case-the narrative mode is what distinguishes dreams from other methods of divination.


2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 257-271
Author(s):  
Georgia Petridou

Abstract:This paper deals with the close link between divine epiphany and artistic inspiration in the life and work of one of the most renowned rhetoricians of the second century AD, Aelius Aristides. The argument in a nutshell is that when Aristides lays emphasis on the divinely ordained character of the Hieroi Logoi, in particular, and his literary and rhetorical composition, in general, he taps into a rich battery of traditional theophilic ideas and narratives (oral and written alike). These narratives accounted for the interaction of divine literary patrons and matrons with privileged members of the intellectual elite to provide thematic or stylistic guidance to their artistic enterprises. Thus, Aristides makes wider claims about his own status of theophilia (lit. ‘the state of being dear to the gods’), a status that was much-praised and much-prized in the Graeco-Roman world, and one that functioned as a status-elevating mechanism in the eyes of both his contemporaries and posterity. Furthermore and on a different level, he also utilizes his theophilic aspirations to elevate his prose-hymns (a genre he invented) to the higher and already established level of encomiastic poetry, which Greeks regarded for centuries as fit for the ears of the gods.


1952 ◽  
Vol 21 (61) ◽  
pp. 23-36 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. D. Phillips

One of the less known but by no means of the less voluminous or peculiar among the Greek writers of the imperial age was Publius Aelius Aristides of the second century, Roman citizen, Greek landowner and rhetorician, and unique in surviving literature as a nervous hypochondriac and lifelong devotee of Asclepius. The details of his career, as recorded in his own writings and in Philostratus' Lives of the Sophists, have been conveniently set forth with full references by André Boulanger in his exhaustive, but very readable, study, Aelius Aristide. Only the framework can be indicated here, to be filled in at certain points with the extraordinary experiences which befell Aristides after illness had altered the course of his life. These are described at length and in great confusion in his Hieroi Logoi, written to glorify Asclepius, which perhaps they do; of Aristides they give a picture which deserves greater fame than it enjoys. Their testimony is of particular value because they have not been selected and edited by an interested priesthood, but are the remnants of a collection which bears all the marks of individual sincerity and private eccentricity.Aristides was born in A.D. 118 on his family's estate at Laneum in Mysia, near Hadrianutherae. His father Eudaemon, who died in his childhood, was a philosopher and priest of Zeus, and evidently a man of wealth and refinement. As a boy he was sent to study under the famous grammaticus, Alexander of Cotiaeum, who was later tutor to Marcus Aurelius, and by him instructed most thoroughly in the poets, orators, historians, and philosophers.


2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 89
Author(s):  
Lolita Guimarães Guerra
Keyword(s):  

As formas de evasão das responsabilidades para com a coisa pública permitem, para alguns indivíduos com os recursos adequados, privilégios e isenções que os retiram do lugar ocupado pela multidão dos ‘comuns’, estes submetidos por igual a leis e com acesso ao mesmo corpo de direitos que os normaliza nas dinâmicas da vida cotidiana. Élio Aristides, baseado em Esmirna, foi indicado a diversas liturgias entre as décadas de 140 e 150 E.C., como mais tarde relatou nos Hieroi Lógoi. Por meio delas, a província e as cidades procuravam garantir a administração de diversos setores da vida social através de custosos encargos atribuídos a particulares. Como não fazia parte do grupo de profissionais isentos por lei, Aristides apelou a sua rede de influências pessoais, a qual incluía o imperador Marco Aurélio, e por meio dela teve a atéleia (imunidade) garantida. Discutiremos os recursos políticos assim utilizados por ele e os significados e efeitos de sua evasão.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document