Commentary on Scheerer-Neumann: Organizing the literature on interventions for reading and writing disabilities

Author(s):  
Keith E. Stanovich
1999 ◽  
Vol 5 (5) ◽  
pp. 452-461 ◽  
Author(s):  
JIMMY JENSEN ◽  
MAY LINDGREN ◽  
ANN WIRSÉN MEURLING ◽  
DAVID H. INGVAR ◽  
STEN LEVANDER

Several investigations have reported high frequencies of reading and writing disabilities in criminal populations. The aims of the present study were to assess the frequency of dyslexia among Swedish prison inmates and to relate dyslexia to other indices of neuropsychological functions. Sixty-three prison inmates with Swedish as their native language, age 19 to 57 years, were examined by interviews, tests of academic achievement, and neuropsychological assessment. Twenty-six (41%) were diagnosed as dyslexic. As expected, the dyslexic group performed more poorly on verbal tests as compared to the normal readers among the prison inmates, but they also performed more poorly on tests measuring nonverbal abilities. The dyslexic group had higher frequencies of paranoid and avoidant personality disorders compared to the nondyslexics. They also reported higher levels of anxiety and suspicion and a lower degree of socialization. Previous studies report low IQ to be associated with criminal propensity, supporting the interpretation that a double handicap (dyslexia and low IQ) increases the risk of entering a criminal career and remaining in it. (JINS, 1999, 5, 452–461.)


Author(s):  
Idor Svensson ◽  
Thomas Nordström ◽  
Emma Lindeblad ◽  
Stefan Gustafson ◽  
Marianne Björn ◽  
...  

1988 ◽  
Vol 55 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-51 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine A. Espin ◽  
Paul T. Sindelar

The effects of listening to and reading passages were compared on the identification and correction of written errors of grammar and syntax. Learning disabled (LD) students were compared with two control groups, one matched on reading level (RDG) and the other on chronological age (CA). Half of all subjects received auditory feedback; the others simply read the passages. For all groups, students listening to the passages located significantly more errors than those reading. Both LD and RDG groups identified fewer errors than did the CA group. These results support the use of auditory feedback and illuminate the relationship between reading and writing disabilities.


2000 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 223-236 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jimmy Jensen ◽  
May Lindgren ◽  
Kajsa Andersson ◽  
David H. Ingvar ◽  
Sten Levander

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document