1.2 Sozialwissenschaftliche Forschung und Social Governance in der VR China: Fallstudien zu Yizu in Urban Villages seit 2009

2021 ◽  
pp. 22-31
2020 ◽  
Vol 77 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 113-125
Author(s):  
Oskar Peterlini
Keyword(s):  

Hongkong (HK), eine frühere britische Kolonie, ging 1997 an die Volksrepublik (VR) China über. Eine weitreichende Autonomie sollte die Insel bei der Einverleibung in das große China schützen und den Bewohnern ihre bisherigen Freiheiten gewährleisten. Ein eigenes, freies Wirtschaftssystem, Grenzen mit Passkontrollen wie bei einer Staatsgrenze, ein eigener Pass, eine eigene Währung, totale Steuerhoheit, Kompetenzen in weitreichenden Bereichen, das sind nur einige der Kennzeichen dieser Autonomie, mit der sich keine Autonomie in Europa messen konnte. Südtirols Autonomie nimmt sich im Vergleich sehr bescheiden aus. Und trotzdem ist genau diese Autonomie schwer angeschlagen, für deren Verteidigung Zehntausende von Bürgern seit Jahren auf die Straße gehen. Die freie westliche Welt hat im Sommer 2020 endlich reagiert, als China ein scharfes Sicherheitsgesetz zum Eingreifen in HK erlassen hat. Der Beitrag will ergründen, wo die Achillesfersen liegen und wieso gerade diese Autonomie in eine schwere Krise rutschte.


Author(s):  
Florian Kölsch ◽  
Anita Wiesbaum ◽  
Norbert Heidelmann ◽  
Klaus Fricke ◽  
Matthias Ginter
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
pp. 097317412098457
Author(s):  
Sarasij Majumder

In the context of declining women’s participation in the formal economy in India, this paper looks at how women’s work in the informal sector of jewellery-making emerges as gift. Gendered discourses on work turn men, who worked as labourers, into supervisors who monitor and control work situations and sort and grade final products in jewellery workshops. Following Anna Tsing, I argue that jewellery products start their lives as gifts but as they move from women (who are seen as housewives and family members) to men (who are seen as professionals/experts within the workshop) and beyond, they become commodities. This journey from gift to commodity within the workshop is made possible by a gendered discourse on work and by the dynamics within small landholding middle-caste households. Further, I underscore that women’s informal networks often help them cope with the emotional and affective tensions of work and the demands imposed on them by the men and their own households. Women facilitate the transition from gift to commodity by colluding amongst themselves to work in these informal spaces to maintain household status within peri-urban villages of West Bengal.


2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (15) ◽  
pp. 8503
Author(s):  
Henrik Skaug Sætra

Artificial intelligence (AI) now permeates all aspects of modern society, and we are simultaneously seeing an increased focus on issues of sustainability in all human activities. All major corporations are now expected to account for their environmental and social footprint and to disclose and report on their activities. This is carried out through a diverse set of standards, frameworks, and metrics related to what is referred to as ESG (environment, social, governance), which is now, increasingly often, replacing the older term CSR (corporate social responsibility). The challenge addressed in this article is that none of these frameworks sufficiently capture the nature of the sustainability related impacts of AI. This creates a situation in which companies are not incentivised to properly analyse such impacts. Simultaneously, it allows the companies that are aware of negative impacts to not disclose them. This article proposes a framework for evaluating and disclosing ESG related AI impacts based on the United Nation’s Sustainable Development Goals (SDG). The core of the framework is here presented, with examples of how it forces an examination of micro, meso, and macro level impacts, a consideration of both negative and positive impacts, and accounting for ripple effects and interlinkages between the different impacts. Such a framework helps make analyses of AI related ESG impacts more structured and systematic, more transparent, and it allows companies to draw on research in AI ethics in such evaluations. In the closing section, Microsoft’s sustainability reporting from 2018 and 2019 is used as an example of how sustainability reporting is currently carried out, and how it might be improved by using the approach here advocated.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document