Modeling in semiotics: an integrative update

2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 639-659
Author(s):  
Hongbing Yu

Abstract This paper provides an integrative and updated view of modeling in semiotics. It postulates that the essence of modeling is supersession. In any act or instance of modeling, the model supersedes and is brought to the front for salience, accessibility, and operability, whereas at the same time the modeled recedes and exists in the background, inaccessible and inoperable. The paper goes on to differentiate between two major types of modeling, the underlying “existential modeling,” functioning as the fundamental scaffold and the genuine foundation of all other types of modeling as we know them, and the overlaying “semiotic modeling,” designating the process of creation and use of “forms of meaning,” a process that underlies both cognition and communication. By focusing on semiotic modeling, the paper features an unconventional view that casts a new light on the relation between a model and a sign and thus the relation between semiotic modeling and semiosis. Endorsing an embodied approach to meaning-making as semiotic modeling, the paper finds it important to stress the appropriateness and necessity of understanding the term “model” as a verb rather than as a noun, in that modeling is never static and should be properly regarded in terms of embodied action.

1997 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 219-230 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dana Kovarsky ◽  
Madeline Maxwell

When taken together, the involvement strategies that operate on sound and meaning, coupled with the historical, spatial, thematic, and relational frames that make up the human world, help form an intricate web that displays how language and context mutually constitute one another. These ideas are not new and have been articulated in various ways through different academic fields of study concerned with the relations between language and social life, including the ethnography of communication, conversation analysis, and systemic linguistics. The location of talk in communities of practice recognizes that language is embodied action that is accomplished within fields in habits of expression and provides a framework for using empirically discovered, natural processes to highlight (rather than disembed) meaning-making resources. That language and context cannot be separated from one another when seeking to understand communication and meaning is a theme that weaves it way throughout the ideas of the authors presented here. Language is more than a tool. It is a primary way of being human and transforming experience in the construction of social reality: "To be human is to be an understander, which is to engage in processes of coherence building or sense making, processes that occur communicatively and that enable humans to constitute, maintain, and develop the worlds we inhabit" (Stewart, 1995, p. 115). By the same token, language incompetence and disorder are socially constituted and manifest themselves by the degree to which they marginalize, alienate, and disassociate individuals from the social world. This does not mean that the grammar and the dictionary of language are unimportant for those seeking to amend communication problems faced by students in schools; rather, they must be contextualized as part of a set of resources for building coherence, participation, and reality in the human world.


1967 ◽  
Vol 31 ◽  
pp. 381-383
Author(s):  
J. M. Greenberg

Van de Hulst (Paper 64, Table 1) has marked optical polarization as a questionable or marginal source of information concerning magnetic field strengths. Rather than arguing about this–I should rate this method asq+-, or quarrelling about the term ‘model-sensitive results’, I wish to stress the historical point that as recently as two years ago there were still some who questioned that optical polarization was definitely due to magnetically-oriented interstellar particles.


2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ed De St. Aubin ◽  
Abbey Valvano ◽  
Terri Deroon-Cassini ◽  
Jim Hastings ◽  
Patricia Horn

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document