Drug–drug interaction of rivaroxaban and calcium channel blockers in patients aged 80 years and older with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation

2020 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dmitry Sychev ◽  
Karin Mirzaev ◽  
Marina Cherniaeva ◽  
Maria Kulikova ◽  
Pavel Bochkov ◽  
...  

AbstractObjectivesFor revealing the peculiarities of the drug–drug interaction of rivaroxaban (substrate CYP3A4 and P-gp) and calcium channel blockers (CCBs) (verapamil – inhibitor CYP3A4 and P-gp and amlodipine – substrate CYP3A4) in patients 80 years and older with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NAF) we studied 128 patients.MethodsAll patients were divided into groups depending on the therapy taken: the 1st – rivaroxaban + amlodipine (n=51), the 2nd – rivaroxaban + verapamil (n=30), the control group – rivaroxaban without CCBs (n=47). A trough steady-state plasma concentration (Cmin,ss) of rivaroxaban, prothrombin time (PT) in the blood plasma and the event of clinically relevant non-major (CRNM) bleeding were assessed for each patient.ResultsPatient in group 2 had higher Cmin,ss of rivaroxaban, PT and CRNM than subjects in the control group (Me 73.8 [50.6–108.8] ng/mL vs. 40.5 [25.6–74.3] ng/mL; Me 14.8 [13.4–17.3] s vs. 13.8 [12.6–14.4] s; 34% vs. 13%, respectively, p<0.05 for all). When compared, the PT and complication rate in group 1 with the control group Cmin,ss of rivaroxaban were practically the same (p>0.05 for all).ConclusionsIn patients ≥80 years with NAF, the use of rivaroxaban in combination with verapamil may not be safe and can lead to CRNM bleeding.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Afek Kodesh ◽  
Eli Lev ◽  
Dorit Leshem-Lev ◽  
Alejandro Solodky ◽  
Ran Kornowski ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose: Calcium channel blockers (CCBs) do not reduce the risk of initial or recurrent myocardial infarction (MI) in patients diagnosed with stable coronary artery disease (CAD). The aim of this current study was to evaluate the association between CCBs and aspirin resistance in patients with CAD. Methods: Patients with stable CAD who were regularly taking aspirin (75-100 mg qd) for at least one month prior to enrollment in the study were included. The VerifyNow system was used for platelet function testing with high on-aspirin platelet reactivity (HAPR) defined as aspirin reaction units (ARU) >550. We compared patients treated with CCBs versus control group. Results: 503 patients with CAD were included in this study, 88 were treated with CCBs; Mean age (67.9±9.7 in the CCB group vs 66.5±11.4 in the control group, p=0.288), gender (77.3 male vs. 82.9%, p=0.214) and rates of diabetes mellitus (34.7 vs. 36.9%, p=.121) were similar. Rates of hypertension were higher in the CCB group (83.9 vs. 63.5%, p<0.01), but rates of past MI were lower (47.1 vs. 59.7%, p=0.039). The mean ARU was 465.4P70.0 for patients treated with CCBs versus 445.2u60.0 in controls (p=0.006). Similarly, 15.9% of CCB patients demonstrated HAPR compared to 7.0% (p=0.006). In a multivariate analysis, the administration of CCBs was independently associated with HAPR (OR- 1.72, 95% CI 1.04 – 8.91, p=0.047). Conclusions: Usage of CCBs is positively correlated with aspirin resistance. These findings may suggest an adverse pharmacologic effect of CCBs among patients with stable CAD treated with aspirin.


2015 ◽  
Vol 48 (5) ◽  
pp. 861-866 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frida Sandberg ◽  
Valentina D.A. Corino ◽  
Luca T. Mainardi ◽  
Sara R. Ulimoen ◽  
Steve Enger ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 48 (12) ◽  
pp. 1570-1579
Author(s):  
Vibha C. A. Desai ◽  
Christina M. L. Kelton ◽  
Anne H. Metzger ◽  
Teresa M. Cavanaugh ◽  
Jeff J. Guo ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document