Modeling and Evaluating Zeolite and Amorphous Based Catalysts in Vacuum Gas Oil Hydrocracking Process

Author(s):  
Davood Faraji ◽  
Sepehr Sadighi ◽  
Hossein Mazaheri

AbstractHydrocracking is a significant process in a refinery which is commonly used for converting heavy fractions such as vacuum gas oil (VGO) to the valuable products such as naphtha and diesel. In this research, VGO hydrocracking process was studied in a pilot scale plant in the presence of a zeolite and two amorphous based commercial catalysts called RK-NiY, RK-MNi and KF-101, respectively. In order to study the effect of support on the yield of the process, a discrete 4-lump kinetic model, including feed (vacuum gas oil and unconverted materials), distillate (diesel and kerosene), naphtha and gas was proposed for each catalyst. At first, each network had six reaction paths and twelve kinetic coefficients, and then by using the model reduction methodology, only four main routes for RK-MNi and RK-NiY, and three ones for KF-101 were designated. Results showed that the absolute average deviation (AAD%) of reduced models decreased from 5.11 %, 10.1 % and 21.8 % to 4.54 %, 8.9 % and 19.67 % for RK-MNi, KF-101 and RK-NiY, respectively. Moreover, it was confirmed that amorphous and zeolite catalysts could be selected for producing middle distillate and naphtha products, respectively.

Author(s):  
Sepehr Sadighi ◽  
Arshad Ahmad ◽  
S. Reza Seif Mohaddecy

A 6-lump kinetic model, including a catalyst decay function for hydrocracking of vacuum gas oil in a commercial plant, is proposed. The model considers vacuum gas oil (VGO) and unconverted oil, having boiling point higher than 380-°C (380+°C) as one lump. Other lumps are diesel (260-380-°C), kerosene (150-260-°C), heavy naphtha (90-150-°C), light naphtha (40-90-°C) and gases (40-°C) as products. Initially, a kinetic network with thirty coefficients is considered, but following an evaluation using measured data and order of magnitude analysis, mainly the route passes of converting middle distillates to naphtha lumps are omitted; thus the number of kinetic coefficients is reduced to eighteen. This result is consistent with the reported characteristics of amorphous catalyst, which has the tendency to produce more distillates than naphtha. By using catalyst decay function in the kinetic model and replacing days on stream with a noble term, called accumulated feed, the prediction of the final approach during 1.5 years is in good agreement with the actual commercial data. The average absolute deviation (AAD%) of the model is less than 5% for all main products. If the residue or unconverted VGO is considered, the error only increases to 6.94% which is still acceptable for a commercial model. The results also confirm that the hydrocracking of VGO to upgraded products is represented better by a second order reaction.


2016 ◽  
Vol 56 (7) ◽  
pp. 634-638 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. A. Zakarina ◽  
L. D. Volkova ◽  
N. A. Shadin ◽  
Ɵ. Dɵlelhanuly ◽  
V. P. Grigor’eva

2012 ◽  
Vol 524-527 ◽  
pp. 1889-1894 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiao Bo Chen ◽  
Ben Xian Shen ◽  
Chun Yi Li ◽  
Hong Hong Shan ◽  
Dong Zhang ◽  
...  

The effects of feedstock’s properties on the propylene yield of catalytic cracking were investigated in a fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) pilot scale riser test unit operating with a circulating catalyst. Under simulated conditions, the results of catalytic cracking with four different gas oils (including two kinds of vacuum gas oil (VGO) and two kinds of coker gas oil (CGO)) show that the yield of propylene is increasing with the ascending hydrogen content of feed. When the hydrogen content is almost the same, propylene yield fed with paraffinic-base VGO is higher than that fed with intermediate-base or naphthenic-base VGO. The lowest yield is fed with CGO because of the more nitrogen compounds, which can poison the acid sites of the zeolitic catalyst.


2018 ◽  
Vol 54 (4) ◽  
pp. 417-424
Author(s):  
N. A. Zakarina ◽  
N. A. Shadin ◽  
L. D. Volkova ◽  
O. K. Kim

2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (7) ◽  
pp. 8452-8465
Author(s):  
Niklas Bergvall ◽  
Linda Sandström ◽  
Fredrik Weiland ◽  
Olov G. W. Öhrman

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document