Descartes’ Innate Ideas

Kant-Studien ◽  
1985 ◽  
Vol 76 (1-4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Frederick P. Van De Pitte
Keyword(s):  
Author(s):  
David Hume
Keyword(s):  

[For the editorial principles applied here, please see the Note on the Text, above.] Endnote [A] to 2.9, p. 151 IT is probable that no more was meant by those, who denied innate ideas, than that all ideas were copies of our impressions;...


Author(s):  
Patricia A. Easton

Le Grand was the foremost expositor and popularizer of Cartesian philosophy in England during the seventeenth century. He wrote on ethics, politics, logic and numerous scientific topics. His Cartesian system is one of the most complete, emphasizing mind–body dualism and interaction, innate ideas, mechanism and method. His theory of signification is important in the Cartesian debate on ideas.


2020 ◽  
pp. 150-174
Author(s):  
Iris Berent

Can you tell what a stranger feels just by looking at their face? Could you distinguish fear from anger even in a person from an entirely unfamiliar culture (without having the opportunity to learn about it from experience)? Laypeople assume they can, because they believe that emotions are inborn, and they are universally imprinted on the body, both externally, on the face, and internally (I sense anxiety in the rumbling of my gut). In fact, people believe that emotions are innate precisely because they believe that emotions are “in the body.” So strong is their conviction that they will insist on their belief even when told that the emotions in question are in fact acquired. Our tendency to view “warm” feelings as embodied and innate is the exact mirror image of our tendency to view “cold” concepts as ephemeral and disembodied. A review of the scientific literature reveals that similar presumptions also plague the debate on universal emotions in affective science. Chapter 10 shows how Essentialism (a principle invoked to explain our aversion to innate ideas) also promotes the promiscuous presumption of innate emotions by laypeople and scientists alike.


2010 ◽  
pp. 66-86
Author(s):  
John Dewey
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Carl J. Richard

“Thomas Jefferson” demonstrates that Jefferson combined elements of Epicureanism with components of Stoicism and Christianity to form a unique philosophy. Jefferson derived from the Stoics and from Cicero the belief in an innate moral sense. Like these forebears, Jefferson envisioned the moral sense as a mere instinct for good that required training (reason acting on experience) to develop into full-blown virtue, rather than as a collection of Platonic innate ideas. Christianity furnished him with the concepts of a creator, a resurrection, and an afterlife. It also provided a system of ethics based on positive benevolence. He preferred the warmth and benevolence of Christianity to the cold obligations of classical philosophy, which centered on the mere avoidance of injury to oneself and others. Epicureanism provided other essential features of Jefferson’s philosophy, such as a materialist metaphysics and consequent rejection of miracles. Although Jefferson’s Epicureanism did not lead him to reject the doctrine of divine providence commonly held in his day, it contributed greatly to his belief that God worked solely through natural causes to achieve his ends. The Epicurean emphasis on the role played by reason (logic) acting on experience in uncovering truth and its concept of free will also influenced the Virginian.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document