scholarly journals Good reporting practice for thermophysical and thermochemical property measurements (IUPAC Technical Report)

2021 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ala Bazyleva ◽  
Jens Abildskov ◽  
Andrzej Anderko ◽  
Olivier Baudouin ◽  
Yury Chernyak ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Information Transfer ◽  
Chemical Compounds ◽  
Thermochemical Property ◽  
Research Practice ◽  
Reporting Practice ◽  
Property Data ◽  
Technical Report ◽  
Measured Property ◽  
Good Research Practice ◽  
Good Research

Abstract Scientific projects frequently involve measurements of thermophysical, thermochemical, and other related properties of chemical compounds and materials. These measured property data have significant potential value for the scientific community, but incomplete and inaccurate reporting often hampers their utilization. The present IUPAC Technical Report summarizes the needs of chemical engineers and researchers as consumers of these data and shows how publishing practices can improve information transfer. In the Report, general principles of Good Reporting Practice are developed together with examples illustrating typical cases of reporting issues. Adoption of these principles will improve the quality, reproducibility, and usefulness of experimental data, bring a better level of consistency to results, and increase the efficiency and impact of research. Closely related to Good Reporting Practice, basic elements of Good Research Practice are also introduced with a goal to reduce the number of ambiguities and unresolved problems within the thermophysical property data domain.

Scientists’ Conceptions of Good Research Practice

2017 ◽  
Vol 25 (6) ◽  
pp. 766-791 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nora Hangel ◽  
Jutta Schickore
Keyword(s):  
Research Practice ◽  
Good Research Practice ◽  
Good Research

Definitions of Fraud and Misconduct Revisited

2014 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Göran Hermerén
Keyword(s):  
Research Community ◽  
Research Practice ◽  
Good Research Practice ◽  
Good Research

AbstractDefinitions of fraud and misconduct are not ethically neutral, and they have implications for the process and procedure of investigations into cases of suspected fraud and misconduct. The aim of this paper is to discuss the strengths and weaknesses of some current definitions of fraud and misconduct, including disjunctive and parallel sets of definitions. Possible purposes of these definitions are explained. Since intention to deceive is difficult to prove, and word often stands against word, allegations may be difficult or impossible to substantiate. If the accused person is not proven guilty, this may be perceived as a signal to the research community that the accused was innocent - even though the work by the accused author contains many serious deviations from good research practice. It turns out that several distinctions need to be made between different kinds of fraud and misconduct, and that these have implications for how best to deal way with suspected scientific dishonesty.

Is Reflexivity Enough? Addressing Reflexive Embodiment, Power, and Whiteness in Sport Management Research

2021 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 30-43
Author(s):  
Joshua D. Vadeboncoeur ◽  
Trevor Bopp ◽  
John N. Singer
Keyword(s):  
Counseling Psychology ◽  
Sport Management ◽  
Ways Of Knowing ◽  
Research Practice ◽  
Management Research ◽  
Psychology Education ◽  
Explicit Consideration ◽  
Good Research Practice ◽  
Methodological Considerations ◽  
Good Research

In this article, the authors drew from the epistemological and methodological considerations of neighboring social science fields (i.e., counseling psychology, education, sociology, and women’s studies), which suggest a reevaluation of reflexive research practice(s). In discussing the implications this reevaluation may have for future sport management research, the authors contend that such dialogue may encourage scholars to understand that, while adopting a reflexive approach is good research practice, it may also mean taking a closer look at how our biases, epistemologies, identities, and values are shaped by whiteness and dominant ways of knowing and, in turn, serve to affect our research practice. Thus, this may allow all researchers, with explicit consideration for those in positions of conceptual, empirical, and methodological, as well as cultural and racial, power, to acknowledge and work toward a more meaningful point of consciousness in conducting sport management research.

A Consensus Meeting on Effective Research Practice in PTSD

CNS Spectrums ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 3 (S2) ◽  
pp. 6-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dennis S. Charney ◽  
Jonathan R.T. Davidson ◽  
Matthew Friedman ◽  
Rajinder Judge ◽  
Terry Keane ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Stress Disorder ◽  
Consensus Meeting ◽  
Response To Treatment ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Research Practice ◽  
Good Research Practice ◽  
Assessment Scales ◽  
Good Research ◽  
Assessment Of Ptsd

AbstractThe aim of this meeting was to obtain a consensus on what constitutes good research practice in posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Objectives were to review relevant parameters of trials, such as the patients recruited, the means of assessing PTSD at baseline, and the change in symptomatology in response to treatment, and to reach a consensus on the most appropriate parameters to use in future research. The bases for the discussion were the 1995 National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) and the National Center for PTSD consensus on the assessment of PTSD, results of drug treatment trials, and information on the assessment scales used in PTSD research.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document