scholarly journals Giant Cell Tumor of Distal Radius Treated by En-Bloc Resection and Reconstruction by Non Vascularized Fibular Graft

2015 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Basavraj Nagoba ◽  
Rajendra G. Malu ◽  
Chetan R. Jaju ◽  
Vishav Goyal ◽  
Santosh Mali
2018 ◽  
Vol 23 (02) ◽  
pp. 255-258
Author(s):  
Kazufumi Sano ◽  
Kazumasa Kimura ◽  
Satoru Ozeki

It is commonly accepted that wide en bloc resection followed by reconstruction is essential in progressive lesions (Campanacci grade III) for local control of possible recurrence. However, specific grade III can be downgraded and treated with intralesional curettage to preserve better wrist function, without increasing the recurrency rates. In this report, Grade III giant cell tumor of the distal radius was successfully treated using vascularized osseous graft from the inner lip of the iliac bone in addition to downgrading strategy.


2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Davod Jafari ◽  
Hooman Shariatzadeh ◽  
Mohammad Ali Okhovatpour ◽  
Mehran Razavipour ◽  
Farshad Safdari

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Vanasiri Kuptniratsaikul ◽  
Pobe Luangjarmekorn ◽  
Chris Charoenlap ◽  
Chindanai Hongsaprabhas ◽  
Pravit Kitidumrongsook

2018 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 249-253
Author(s):  
Khodamorad Jamshidi ◽  
Mehrdad Bahrabadi ◽  
Abolfazl Bagherifard ◽  
Mehdi Mohamadpour

2013 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 103-108 ◽  
Author(s):  
Theresa J.C Pazionis ◽  
Hussain Alradwan ◽  
Benjamin M Deheshi ◽  
Robert Turcotte ◽  
Forough Farrokhyar ◽  
...  

Introduction: Surgical management of Giant Cell Tumor of Bone of the distal radius (GCTDR) remains controversial due to risk of local recurrence (LR) offset by functional limitations which result from en-bloc resection. This study aims to determine the oncologic and functional outcomes of wide excision (WE) vs intralesional curettage (IC) of GCTDR. Methods: A complete search of the applicable literature was done. Included studies reported on patients from the same cohort who were surgically treated for GCTDR with WE or IC. Two reviewers independently assessed all papers. The primary outcome measure was LR. Results: One-hundred-forty-one patients from six studies were included: 60 treated with WE, and 81 with IC. Five WE patients (8%) suffered LR whereas 25 IC patients (31%) did. The odds of LR were three times less in the WE group vs the IC group. MSTS1993 scores, where available, were on average 'good' with WE and 'excellent' with IC. Conclusions: Within statistical limitations the data support an attempt, where feasible, at wrist joint preservation and superior function with IC. Intralesional curettage is reasonable when the functional benefit outweighs the risk of recurrence as is the case in many cases of GCT of the distal radius.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document