Therapeutic outcome of active management in male patients with detrusor underactivity based on clinical diagnosis and videourodynamic classification

Detrusor underactivity (DU) could be resulted from many different etiologies. Patients with DU might have reduced bladder sensation, low detrusor contractility, and large post-void residual volume. This study analyzed therapeutic outcome of active management for male DU patients, based on clinical and urodynamic characteristics. Male DU patients aged > 18 years old were retrospectively reviewed from the videourodynamic study (VUDS) records in recent 10 years. The patients’ demographics, VUDS results, treatment modalities, and treatment outcome were analyzed. The treatment outcomes were compared among patients with different DU subgroups, clinical diagnosis and treatment modalities. Patients with voiding efficiency of > 66.7% were considered having a successful treatment outcome. For comparison, 30 men with normal VUDS finding served as the control arm. Most of the DU patients had reduced bladder sensation. The reduced bladder sensation is closely associated with low detrusor contractility. After active treatment, a successful outcome was achieved in 68.4% of patients after bladder outlet surgery, 59.1% after urethral botulinum toxin A injection, and 57.6% after medical treatment, but only 18.2% after conservative treatment. A successful treatment outcome was achieved in patients with an intact detrusor contractility, either low (69.2%) or normal voiding pressure (81.8%), and in patients with a normal or increased bladder sensation (78.1%). However, patients with detrusor acontractile (41.3%) or absent bladder sensation (17.9%) had less favorable treatment outcome after any kind of urological management. This study revealed that active management can effectively improve voiding efficiency in patients with DU. The normal bladder sensation, presence of adequate detrusor contractility, and bladder outlet narrowing during VUDS provide effective treatment strategy for DU patients. Among all management, BOO surgery provides the best treatment outcome.

Botulinum Toxins for Aesthetic Facial Injections – A scientific review to support evidence-based best practice.

Botulinum Toxins (BoNT) are complex biological products. Each licensed BoNTA has its own individual characteristics resulting into different attributes, some of them being of clinical relevance. Besides profound anatomical knowledge and understanding of aesthetic principles, the responsible injecting physician should be aware of those pharmaceutical and clinical properties. Especially against the background of new BoNTA formulations receiving approval by the authorities a critical and dedicated discussion on the individual characteristics should take place and the potential relevance on the treatment outcome should be taken into consideration.

Optimising treatment expectations in chronic lower back pain through observing others: a study protocol for a randomised clinical trial

IntroductionChronic lower back pain (CLBP) is a frequent cause of medical consultations worldwide, and it results in decreased quality of life and disability. Current treatments for CLBP are often not effective, and alternatives are urgently needed. Three promising possibilities have emerged: (1) open-label placebo treatment reduces chronic pain, (2) placebo treatment is as efficacious as opioid treatment with a high correlation between patient expectation and treatment outcome, and (3) observing positive effects in another patient can improve functional capacity. We hypothesise that treatment expectations can be positively influenced through social observation and improve treatment outcome.Methods and analysisIn our clinical trial, we will randomise patients with CLBP into five groups. Two groups receive either a 3 week course of treatment with an analgesic (ANA) (metamizole/dipyrone) or with open-label placebos (OLP). For one of each group, we will build treatment expectations through observational learning and assess its impact on the treatment. For this purpose, one group each will watch either a positive or a neutral video. The intervention groups will be compared with a control group that will not be given any medication or observational learning. Participants will be recruited via all institutions in the Hamburg metropolitan area that treat patients with CLBP. Patients are eligible for inclusion if they are at least 18 years or older, have CLBP (of at least 3 months duration), and agree to potentially receive an active ANA or an OLP. Patients with pain-related “red flags” will be excluded. The study requires 150 participants (30 participants per group) to assess the differences in the primary outcome, pain intensity. Secondary outcomes include changes in treatment expectations, anxiety, comorbid depression, stress-related neuroendocrine measures, functional and structural connectivity, functional capacity, and ANA consumption. All outcomes and treatment expectations will be measured before and after the intervention and 3 months post-intervention.Ethics and disseminationEthical approval was obtained in January 2020 from the Hamburg Medical Ethics Council (ref number PV7067). Outcomes will be disseminated through publications in peer-reviewed journals and presentations at national and international conference meetings.Trial registration numberThe approved trial protocol was registered at the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS) and can be found at drks.de (Identifier: DRKS00024418).