scholarly journals A Basal Forebrain Site Coordinates the Modulation of Endocrine and Behavioral Stress Responses via Divergent Neural Pathways

2016 ◽  
Vol 36 (33) ◽  
pp. 8687-8699 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shane B. Johnson ◽  
Eric B. Emmons ◽  
Rachel M. Anderson ◽  
Ryan M. Glanz ◽  
Sara A. Romig-Martin ◽  
...  
2003 ◽  
Vol 100 (21) ◽  
pp. 12213-12218 ◽  
Author(s):  
F.-C. Hsu ◽  
G.-J. Zhang ◽  
Y. S. H. Raol ◽  
R. J. Valentino ◽  
D. A. Coulter ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 45 (2) ◽  
pp. 263-272
Author(s):  
Aaron S. Baker ◽  
Scott D. Litwack ◽  
Joshua D. Clapp ◽  
J. Gayle Beck ◽  
Denise M. Sloan

2014 ◽  
Vol 45 ◽  
pp. 142-153 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sriparna Ghosal ◽  
Jana Bundzikova-Osacka ◽  
C. Mark Dolgas ◽  
Brent Myers ◽  
James P. Herman

2000 ◽  
Vol 43 (5) ◽  
pp. 441-450 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. von Borell

Abstract. Title of the paper: Coping strategies during stress The response to Stressors requires a progression of events beginning with sensing and signalling the animal's various biological mechanisms that a threat exists. These events are followed by activation of neurophysiological mechanisms to mount a biological effort to resist and prevent major damage. The various sensory detectors not only receive the information but transform that information into neural signals that are transmitted to either or botn cognitive and non-cognitive centres of the nervous system to generate a co-ordinated response to the challenge. The hypothalamic-adrenal medullary system involves the hypothalamus, pituitary gland, the sympathetic neural pathways to the adrenal medulla, and the release of epinephrine by the adrenal gland. This short acting stressresponse was originally proposed by W. Cannon and is referred to as the Fight-Flight Syndrome (FFS). The hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical (HPA) stress-response System represents a longer-term, sustained response to Stressors and was conceptualised by Hans Selye (General Adaptation Syndrome, GAS). The major adrenal cortical hormones are corticosteroids and aldosterone. These two classical stress response Systems have been linked to different coping pattern in that FFS is primarily activated in situations of threat of control, whereas the pituitary-adrenocortical System is activated in situations of loss of control. Besides these classical physiological Systems other Systems are activated during stress, including the immune system. Recent research suggests that the endocrine, immune and central nervous Systems interact and respond to stressful Stimuli in a co-ordinated manner. The presence of hormones, neurotransmitters and receptors common to all three Systems Supports the view that communication exists between these Systems. Psychological Stressors perceived as threats may be equally important as those of a physical nature in challenging coping mechanisms. Situations of uncertainty, social pressure and fear are potent Stressors with relevance for the well-being of animals, leading to severe damage to specific target organs and tissues or even to death in some species. Studies on stress responses in farm animals are often conducted on the basis of single physiological alterations or irregular behavioural phenomena that might be difficult to interpret. Non-invasive methods for measuring stress-indicating parameters have been developed in addition to classical descriptive behavioural observations, allowing an evaluation of stress by multiple criteria under different housing conditions and handling procedures.


SLEEP ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 42 (10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mayumi Machida ◽  
Amy M Sutton ◽  
Brook L Williams ◽  
Laurie L Wellman ◽  
Larry D Sanford

Abstract Study Objectives Sleep, in particular rapid eye movement (REM), has been linked to fear learning and extinction; however, their relationship is poorly understood. We determined how different delays of extinction training (ET) impact fear-conditioned behaviors, changes in sleep, and stress responses. Methods EEG activity, movement, and body temperature in mice were monitored via telemetry. Following contextual fear conditioning (shock training [ST]), separate groups of mice were reexposed to the context at 24-hour post-ST (24h ET-1) and at 48-hour post-ST (48h ET-1). Post-ET sleep amount and sleep-associated EEG (delta and theta) activity were compared to baseline and to post-ST sleep. Freezing, locomotion, grooming, and rearing were monitored to determine effects of ET on fear behaviors. Body temperature immediately after ET was monitored to assess stress-induced hyperthermia (SIH). Results 24h ET-1 and 48h ET-1 produced similar freezing and REM reductions, but dissimilar rearing activity and SIH. 24h ET-1 was followed by periods of suppressed REM-associated theta (REM-θ) activity, immediately after ET and during the subsequent dark period. Suppressed REM-θ was specific to sleep after 24h ET-1, and did not occur after ST, nor after 48h ET-1. Conclusions ET-1 at 24 and 48 hours after ST was associated with similar freezing and REM amounts, but with differences in other overt behaviors, in REM-θ, and in SIH. Freezing was not predictive of changes in other fear-associated responses. This study demonstrated that consideration of time delay from fear acquisition to extinction is important when assessing the relationships between extinction and behavior, sleep, and stress responses.


2011 ◽  
Vol 54 (7) ◽  
pp. 685-699 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nissa R. Towe-Goodman ◽  
Cynthia A. Stifter ◽  
W. Roger Mills-Koonce ◽  
Douglas A. Granger ◽  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document