Water, Atmosphere, and Environmental Governance: A Comprehensive Perspective:Reflections on Water: New Approaches to Transboundary Conflicts and Cooperation.;Changing the Atmosphere: Expert Knowledge and Environmental Governance.

2003 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 54-56
Author(s):  
Enzo Ferrara
2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 215-243
Author(s):  
Joseph F.C. DiMento ◽  
Christine Schrottenbaum ◽  
Elizabeth Taylor

The urgency of applying effective legal strategies to respond to environmental change in the Arctic is ever more apparent. The existing framework for environmental governance has matured and its constituents are numerous, and many are promising. However, policymakers and other stakeholders contend that new approaches to confronting environmental conditions, including mitigation of climate change and adapting to it, are needed. Many ideas have been offered; they range considerably in their assessment of what changes are needed and by when. Here we briefly describe the cluster of constituents of environmental governance, the international environmental regime, of the Arctic; we briefly note newly recommended approaches; and we analyse two approaches we consider most promising. These, cooperative scientific-based management strategies and adversarial legal actions, are dissimilar – to the point that some policy makers consider them incompatible. We argue, however, that both are needed and we describe elements of their successful use.


2018 ◽  
Vol 48 (5) ◽  
pp. 691-714 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lauren Richter ◽  
Alissa Cordner ◽  
Phil Brown

Understandings of environmental governance both assume and challenge the relationship between expert knowledge and corresponding action. We explore this interplay by examining the context of knowledge production pertaining to a contested class of chemicals. Per-and polyfluorinated alkyl substances (PFASs) are widely used industrial compounds containing chemical chains of carbon and fluorine that are persistent, bioaccumulative and toxic. Although industry and regulatory scientists have studied the exposure and toxicity concerns of these compounds for decades, and several contaminated communities have documented health concerns as a result of their high levels of exposure, PFAS use remains ubiquitous in a large range of consumer and industrial products. Despite this significant history of industry knowledge production documenting exposure and toxicity concerns, the regulatory approach to PFASs has been limited. This is largely due to a regulatory framework that privileges industry incentives for rapid market entry and trade secret protection over substantive public health protection, creating areas of unseen science, research that is conducted but never shared outside of institutional boundaries. In particular, the risks of PFASs have been both structurally hidden and unexamined by existing regulatory and industry practice. This reveals the uneven pathways that construct issues of social and scientific concern.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document