“Choc en Retour”

2018 ◽  
pp. 74-104
Author(s):  
Eli Jelly-Schapiro

The contemporary theorization of security and terror, this chapter demonstrates, is less a direct and autonomous critical project than a synthesis of three categories of critique: the critique of spectacle; the critique of the politics of exception; and the critique of global capital qua empire. Each of these categories of critique is conditioned by but unevenly revelatory of the “choc en retour” of colonial rationality to the metropole—the boomerang return, to the postcolonial North, of imperial forms of governance and accumulation. This unevenness, this chapter argues, is an effect of, and reveals, theory’s symptomatic nature—the ways in which theory often echoes the form of its critical object.

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael McCord ◽  
Stanley McGreal ◽  
Jim Berry ◽  
Olawumi Fadeyi

2000 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 70-94
Author(s):  
Tahir Beg

The philosophical-theoretical premise of globalization is ignorant of thevalues of justice, equity, and oneness of humanity, hence it leads to verticalintegration of humanity, systemic vacuum in global governance,drastic erosion in national policy autonomy, and accountability-freeempowerment of global capital. The Islamic worldview provides analternative paradigm for globalization and offers wide scope for refprmof contemporary globalization by re-exploring the interrelationshipbetween the concepts ‘Ummah’ and ‘one humanity.’ This suggests thatoperational re-orientation of Islamic economic institutions is greatlyneeded to protect the Ummah and humanity against the vulnerabilitiesof contemporary globalization


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document