Audit of adrenal crisis management at University Hospitals Leicester NHS Trust

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sing Yee Sim ◽  
Akash Mavilakandy ◽  
Nikki Kieffer ◽  
Emma Bremner ◽  
Carole Robinson ◽  
...  
2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alice Hacker ◽  
Anna Crown ◽  
Sue Jackson

2017 ◽  
Vol 23 ◽  
pp. 26
Author(s):  
Samantha Tan ◽  
Mohamad Rachid ◽  
Irfan Siddiqui ◽  
Tahira Yasmeen

VASA ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 47 (3) ◽  
pp. 235-241 ◽  
Author(s):  
Soon Cheon Lee ◽  
Jin Hyun Joh ◽  
Jeong-Hwan Chang ◽  
Hyung-Kee Kim ◽  
Jang Yong Kim ◽  
...  

Abstract. Background: Endovascular treatment is an alternative first-line management for peripheral artery disease (PAD). Hybrid treatment (HT) is defined as a combined treatment for patients with PAD using endovascular and open surgery, simultaneously performed in an operating room. The results of HT are reportedly good for multilevel revascularization (MR) in patients with chronic limb ischaemia, and even in older high-risk patients. The goal of this study was to examine the clinical and haemodynamic outcomes of HT in patients who need MR. Patients and methods: Nine university hospitals in Korea participated in this multicentre study. A total of 134 patients with multilevel PAD underwent HT and MR. Patients were enrolled from July 2014 to June 2015 and were followed for 18 months. Results: The mean age of the patients was 68.8 ± 9.93 years and 88.1 % were men. Patients with Rutherford category 2 to 3 and 4 to 6 comprised 59.0 % and 42.0 % of the group, respectively. The technical success rate was 100 %. The primary patency rates at 12 and 18 months were 77.6 % and 63.9 %, respectively. The primary-assisted patency rates at 12 and 18 months were both 90.0 %. The pre-operative mean ankle brachial index (0.43 ± 0.23) increased to 0.87 ± 0.23 at six months post-operatively (t-test, p < 0.05). The amputation free survival rate was 97.1 %. Conclusions: Although outcomes of multilevel PAD are reportedly poor when endovascular treatment alone is used, we have shown that HT is a feasible alternative modality for patients with multilevel PAD, with satisfactory amputation-free survival and freedom from re-intervention rates.


2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Glenn E. Meyer ◽  
Carolyn B. Becker ◽  
Melissa M. Graham ◽  
John S. Price ◽  
Ashley Arsena ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Calvo ◽  
M. Moreno ◽  
A. Ruiz-Sancho ◽  
M. Rapado-Castro ◽  
C. Moreno ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 32 (S 01) ◽  
pp. 25-S28
Author(s):  
H. Rott ◽  
G. Kappert ◽  
S. Halimeh

SummaryA top quality, effective treatment of haemophilia requires an integrated therapeutical concept and an excellent cooperation of an interdisciplinary team. Since years different models are discussed in Germany in order to enlarge the offers for a suitable care of patients with hard to treat diseases. The healthpolitical targets are expressed in the changes of the Code of Social Law number V (SGB V) and in innovations in the statutory health insurance. This new legal basis provides opportunities to implement innovative treatment concepts outside university hospitals and paves the way for ambulant haemophilia centres to offer an integral care, all legally saved by a contract.The Coagulation Centre Rhine-Ruhr reveals as an example how haemophilia treatment in accordance with guidelines and with the latest results of international research can be realise in an ambulatory network.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document