A Media-Archaeological Interpretation of the Optical Device: Magic Lantern Represented in Hyungsub Shin’s Latest Artwork

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 23-27
Author(s):  
Hyungsub Shin
Keyword(s):  
Optical Device ◽  
Archaeological Interpretation ◽  
Magic Lantern

Chip to Chip Communication at Three Windows: A Proposed Optical Device to VLSI Industry

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sangram Keshari Nayak ◽  
G.R.K.D. Satya Prasad ◽  
Gopinath Palai
Keyword(s):  
Optical Device

Nano-Scale Lateral Milling with Focused Ion Beam for Ultra-Smooth Optical Device Surface~!2009-12-16~!2010-02-18~!2010-04-21~!

2010 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-58 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yeonjoon Park ◽  
SangJoon Park ◽  
Uhn Lee ◽  
Sang H. Choi
Keyword(s):  
Focused Ion Beam ◽  
Ion Beam ◽  
Optical Device ◽  
Nano Scale

A design to use computational science for archaeological interpretation

1992 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 179-181
Author(s):  
Virginia Hetrick ◽  
Richard M. Leventhal ◽  
Dwight M. Read
Keyword(s):  
Computational Science ◽  
Archaeological Interpretation

The (Mis)Representation of Reality: ‘Knowledge’ and Image-Making in Glass Lantern Slides of China

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-17
Author(s):  
AMY MATHEWSON
Keyword(s):  
Political Systems ◽  
Asiatic Society ◽  
Late Nineteenth ◽  
Magic Lantern ◽  
Selection Of ◽  
Royal Asiatic Society

Abstract The Royal Asiatic Society in London houses a collection of magic lantern slides of China dating from the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. By investigating a selection of lantern slides, this article explores their epistemological nature and their wider relations to socio-cultural and political systems of power. These lantern slides highlight the complexity of our ways of seeing and representing that are embedded into particular historical and ideological systems in which meaning is both shaped and negotiated. This article argues that images are powerful conduits in disseminating and, if unchallenged, maintaining particular notions and ideas.

scholarly journals Documentation of Archaeology-Specific Workflow for Airborne LiDAR Data Processing

Geosciences ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 26
Author(s):  
Edisa Lozić ◽  
Benjamin Štular
Keyword(s):  
Data Processing ◽  
Good Practice ◽  
Airborne Lidar ◽  
Archaeological Prospection ◽  
Hard Data ◽  
Cloud Processing ◽  
Archaeological Interpretation ◽  
Point Cloud Processing ◽  
Data Acquisition And Processing ◽  
Airborne Lidar Data

Airborne LiDAR is a widely accepted tool for archaeological prospection. Over the last decade an archaeology-specific data processing workflow has been evolving, ranging from raw data acquisition and processing, point cloud processing and product derivation to archaeological interpretation, dissemination and archiving. Currently, though, there is no agreement on the specific steps or terminology. This workflow is an interpretative knowledge production process that must be documented as such to ensure the intellectual transparency and accountability required for evidence-based archaeological interpretation. However, this is rarely the case, and there are no accepted schemas, let alone standards, to do so. As a result, there is a risk that the data processing steps of the workflow will be accepted as a black box process and its results as “hard data”. The first step in documenting a scientific process is to define it. Therefore, this paper provides a critical review of existing archaeology-specific workflows for airborne LiDAR-derived topographic data processing, resulting in an 18-step workflow with consistent terminology. Its novelty and significance lies in the fact that the existing comprehensive studies are outdated and the newer ones focus on selected aspects of the workflow. Based on the updated workflow, a good practice example for its documentation is presented.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document