scholarly journals Long-Term Prognosis of Patients Who Underwent Percutaneous Transvenous Mitral Commissurotomy for Mitral Stenosis

2020 ◽  
Vol 61 (6) ◽  
pp. 1183-1187
Author(s):  
Naoki Kubota ◽  
Kazuyuki Ozaki ◽  
Makoto Hoyano ◽  
Kota Nishida ◽  
Toshiki Takano ◽  
...  
2016 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 15-17
Author(s):  
Chandra Mani Adhikari

Mitral stenosis (MS) is almost invariably the result of long term complication of rheumatic fever. Based upon the nature and severity of MS, patients can be managed with medical treatment, percutaneous transvenous mitral commissurotomy (PTMC) or surgery. PTMC is proven to be simple, effective and safe; it is considered as treatment of choice in the management of MS. In Shahid Gangalal National Heart Centre, PTMC service started in 2001. First PTMC in the centre was done on 14th April 2001. Till June2016, 6023 PTMCs were done in the centre. Multiple studies evaluated the safety and efficacy of PTMC in different groups of patients. These studies clearly demonstrated the safety and effectiveness of PTMC in our centre. This article summarizes the historical development, current status and future perspectives of PTMC procedure at Shahid Gangalal National Heart Centre, a teritary care cardiac centre in Nepal.Nepalese Heart Journal 2016; 13(2): 15-17


2005 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 55 ◽  
Author(s):  
Azman Ates ◽  
Yahya �nl� ◽  
Ibrahim Yekeler ◽  
Bilgehan Erkut ◽  
Yavuz Balci ◽  
...  

Purpose: To evaluate long-term survival and valve-related complications as well as prognostic factors for mid- and long-term outcome after closed mitral commissurotomy, covering a follow-up period of 14 years. Material and Methods: Between 1989 and 2003, 36 patients (28 women and 8 men, mean age 28.8 6.1 years) underwent closed mitral commissurotomy at our institution. The majority of patients were in New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class IIB, III, or IV. Indication for closed mitral commissurotomy was mitral stenosis. Closed mitral commissurotomy was undertaken with a Tubbs dilator in all cases. Median operating time was 2.5 hours 30 minutes. Results: After closed mitral commissurotomy, the mitral valve areas of these patients were increased substantially, from 0.9 to 2.11 cm2. No further operation after initial closed mitral commissurotomy was required in 86% of the patients (n = 31), and NYHA functional classification was improved in 94% (n = 34). Postoperative complications and operative mortality were not seen. Follow-up revealed restenosis in 8.5% (n = 3) of the patients, minimal mitral regurgitation in 22.2% (n = 8), and grade 3 mitral regurgitation in 5.5% (n = 2) patients. No early mortality occurred in closed mitral commissurotomy patients. Reoperation was essential for 5 patients following closed mitral commissurotomy; 2 procedures were open mitral commissurotomies and 3 were mitral valve replacements. No mortality occurred in these patients. Conclusions: The mitral valve area was significantly increased and the mean mitral valve gradient was reduced in patients after closed mitral commissurotomy. Closed mitral commissurotomy is a safe alternative to open mitral commissurotomy and balloon mitral commissurotomy in selected patients.


2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yahya Dadjo ◽  
Maryam Moshkani Farahani ◽  
Reza Nowshad ◽  
Mohsen Sadeghi Ghahrodi ◽  
Alireza Moaref ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Rheumatic heart disease (RHD) is still a concerning issue in developing countries. Among delayed RHD presentations, rheumatic mitral valve stenosis (MS) remains a prevalent finding. Percutaneous transvenous mitral commissurotomy (PTMC) is the intervention of choice for severe mitral stenosis (MS). We aimed to assess the mid-term outcome of PTMC in patients with immediate success. Methods In this retrospective cohort study, out of 220 patients who had undergone successful PTMC between 2006 and 2018, the clinical course of 186 patients could be successfully followed. Cardiac-related death, undergoing a second PTMC or mitral valve replacement (MVR) were considered adverse cardiac events for the purpose of this study. In order to find significant factors related to adverse cardiac outcomes, peri-procedural data for the studied patients were collected.The patients were also contacted to find out their current clinical status and whether they had continued secondary antibiotic prophylaxis regimen or not. Those who had not suffered from the adverse cardiac events were additionally asked to undergo echocardiographic imaging, in order to assess the prevalence of mitral valve restenosis, defined as mitral valve area (MVA) < 1.5 cm2 and loss of ≥ 50% of initial area gain. Results During the mean follow-up time of 5.69 ± 3.24 years, 31 patients (16.6% of patients) had suffered from adverse cardiac events. Atrial fibrillation rhythm (p = 0.003, HR = 3.659), Wilkins echocardiographic score > 8 (p = 0.028, HR = 2.320) and higher pre-procedural systolic pulmonary arterial pressure (p = 0.021, HR = 1.031) were three independent predictors of adverse events and immediate post-PTMC mitral valve area (IMVA) ≥ 2 cm2 (p < 0.001, HR = 0.06) was the significant predictor of event-free outcome. Additionally, follow-up echocardiographic imaging detected mitral restenosis in 44 patients (23.6% of all patients). The only statistically significant protective factor against restenosis was again IMVA ≥ 2 cm2 (p = 0.001, OR = 0.240). Conclusion The mid-term results of PTMC are multifactorial and may be influenced by heterogeneous peri-procedural determinants. IMVA had a great impact on the long-term success of this procedure. Continuing secondary antibiotic prophylaxis was not a protective factor against adverse cardiac events in this study. (clinicaltrial.gov registration: NCT04112108).


1984 ◽  
Vol 37 (2) ◽  
pp. 159-163 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susumu Nakano ◽  
Yasunaru Kawashima ◽  
Hajime Hirose ◽  
Hikaru Matsuda ◽  
Yasuhisa Shimazaki ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 66-70
Author(s):  
Satya Narayana Murthy Jayanthi Sriram ◽  
Balasubramaniyan Jayanthi Venkata ◽  
Thanikachalam Sadagopan ◽  
Muralidharan Thodi Ramamurthy

2016 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 58-63
Author(s):  
Huliyurdurga Srinivasa Setty Natraj Setty ◽  
Veeresh Patil Hebbal ◽  
Yeriswamy Mogalahalli Channabasappa ◽  
Santosh Jadhav ◽  
Kandenahalli Shankarappa Ravindranath ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document