LESSONS LEARNT FROM OPEN PIT WALL INSTABILITIES: CASE STUDIES OF BC OPEN PIT HARD ROCK MINES

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (23) ◽  
Author(s):  
John Loui Porathur ◽  
Minnie Jose ◽  
Rana Bhattacharjee ◽  
Subashish Tewari

Author(s):  
E. Karampinos ◽  
J. Hadjigeorgiou ◽  
P. Turcotte ◽  
F. Mercier-Langevin

1990 ◽  
Vol 80 (5) ◽  
pp. 1057-1078
Author(s):  
K. W. King ◽  
A. C. Tarr ◽  
D. L. Carver ◽  
R. A. Williams ◽  
D. M. Worley

Abstract Relative seismic ground-response characteristics in the cities of Olympia, Lacey, and Tumwater, Washington, were determined from analysis of instrumentally recorded ground motion induced by blasts at an open-pit coal mine near Centralia, Washington. A ground-response function (GRF), defined as the ratio of Fourier spectral amplitudes at an alluvium site to spectral amplitudes on hard rock, is a measure of amplification of seismic waves by localized site conditions. GRF values in three frequency bands (0.5 to 1.0 Hz, 1.0 to 2.0 Hz, and 2.0 to 4.0 Hz) were compared with observed Modified Mercalli (MM) intensities from the 29 April 1965, Puget Sound earthquake and with mapped surficial geologic units. Typically, the GRF values relate well with the surficial geological units. In addition, MM intensities within the V to VII range appear to be directly related to the frequencies within the 0.5 to 4.0 Hz bandwidth such that MM V intensity sites had a lower GRF value in the 2.0 to 4.0 Hz bandwidth as compared to the 0.5 to 2.0 Hz bandwidth, and the MM VII intensity sites had higher GRF values in the 2.0 to 4.0 Hz bandwidth as compared to the 0.5 to 2.0 Hz bandwidth. The set of GRF values determined for the city of Olympia and its vicinity should be useful in formulating a theoretical relative ground-response model for the southern Puget Sound area.


2019 ◽  
pp. 193-204
Author(s):  
Wolfgang Grisold ◽  
Anna Klicpera ◽  
Thomas Grisold

This chapter takes an international perspective on advocacy. It focuses on the question of how international advocacy projects can look like and what makes them successful. In doing so, we turn to the practical and applied sides of advocacy. Advocacy activities aim at taking the voice of patients to inform, protect, and support them. In the first part of this chapter, we will present successful cases of advocacy activities in neurology. In the second part, we will reflect on personal experiences where advocacy activities were or should have been implemented. Reflecting on these cases, we present some lessons learnt that advocates may want to consider when they plan and implement international advocacy activities.


2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 141-149 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isaac Vennes ◽  
Hani Mitri ◽  
Damodara Reddy Chinnasane ◽  
Mike Yao

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document