scholarly journals An estimate about multiple stochastic integrals with respect to a normalized empirical measure

2005 ◽  
Vol 42 (3) ◽  
pp. 295-341 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Major

Let a sequence of iid. random variables ξ 1 , …, ξ n be given on a measurable space ( X,X ) with distribution µ together with a function f ( x1 , …, xk ) on the product space ( Xk , Xk ). Let µ n denote the empirical measure defined by these random variables and consider the random integral \documentclass{aastex} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{bm} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{pifont} \usepackage{stmaryrd} \usepackage{textcomp} \usepackage{upgreek} \usepackage{portland,xspace} \usepackage{amsmath,amsxtra} \usepackage{bbm} \pagestyle{empty} \DeclareMathSizes{10}{9}{7}{6} \begin{document} $$J_{n,k} (f) = \frac{{n^{{k \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {k 2}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} 2}} }}{{k!}}\smallint 'f(u_1 ,...,u_k )(\mu _n (du_1 ) - \mu (du_1 ))...(\mu _n (du_k ) - \mu (du_k )),$$ \end{document} where prime means that the diagonals are omitted from the domain of integration. A good bound is given on the probability P (| Jn,k ( f )| > x ) for all x > 0 which is similar to the estimate in the analogous problem we obtain by considering the Gaussian (multiple) Wiener-Itô integral of the function f . The proof is based on an adaptation of some methods of the theory of Wiener-Itô integrals. In particular, a sort of diagram formula is proved for the random integrals Jn,k ( f ) together with some of its important properties, a result which may be interesting in itself. The relation of this paper to some results about U -statistics is also discussed.

Author(s):  
SERGIO ALBEVERIO ◽  
MINORU W. YOSHIDA

Multiple stochastic integrals with respect to the Gaussian white noise indexed by Rd are used for the construction of reflection positive non-Gaussian [Formula: see text] valued random variables (random fields). This construction is then extended to a class of Hida distribution to consider several interesting examples. In particular, some new fields (without full Euclidean invariance but satisfying all other axioms, including space rotation invariance) are constructed through this probabilistic (and purely Euclidean) procedure.


1992 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 431-441 ◽  
Author(s):  
P.E. Kloeden ◽  
E. Platen ◽  
I.W. Wright

1994 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 1536-1575 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Schweizer

2008 ◽  
Vol 45 (04) ◽  
pp. 1196-1203 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carl Graham

Classical results for exchangeable systems of random variables are extended to multiclass systems satisfying a natural partial exchangeability assumption. It is proved that the conditional law of a finite multiclass system, given the value of the vector of the empirical measures of its classes, corresponds to independent uniform orderings of the samples within {each} class, and that a family of such systems converges in law {if and only if} the corresponding empirical measure vectors converge in law. As a corollary, convergence within {each} class to an infinite independent and identically distributed system implies asymptotic independence between {different} classes. A result implying the Hewitt-Savage 0-1 law is also extended.


2013 ◽  
Vol 80 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tara Raveendran ◽  
D. Roy ◽  
R. M. Vasu

The Girsanov linearization method (GLM), proposed earlier in Saha, N., and Roy, D., 2007, “The Girsanov Linearisation Method for Stochastically Driven Nonlinear Oscillators,” J. Appl. Mech.,74, pp. 885–897, is reformulated to arrive at a nearly exact, semianalytical, weak and explicit scheme for nonlinear mechanical oscillators under additive stochastic excitations. At the heart of the reformulated linearization is a temporally localized rejection sampling strategy that, combined with a resampling scheme, enables selecting from and appropriately modifying an ensemble of locally linearized trajectories while weakly applying the Girsanov correction (the Radon–Nikodym derivative) for the linearization errors. The semianalyticity is due to an explicit linearization of the nonlinear drift terms and it plays a crucial role in keeping the Radon–Nikodym derivative “nearly bounded” above by the inverse of the linearization time step (which means that only a subset of linearized trajectories with low, yet finite, probability exceeds this bound). Drift linearization is conveniently accomplished via the first few (lower order) terms in the associated stochastic (Ito) Taylor expansion to exclude (multiple) stochastic integrals from the numerical treatment. Similarly, the Radon–Nikodym derivative, which is a strictly positive, exponential (super-) martingale, is converted to a canonical form and evaluated over each time step without directly computing the stochastic integrals appearing in its argument. Through their numeric implementations for a few low-dimensional nonlinear oscillators, the proposed variants of the scheme, presently referred to as the Girsanov corrected linearization method (GCLM), are shown to exhibit remarkably higher numerical accuracy over a much larger range of the time step size than is possible with the local drift-linearization schemes on their own.


1998 ◽  
Vol 64 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 161-176
Author(s):  
Tsung-Ming Chad ◽  
Ching-sung Chou

Author(s):  
Ivan Kramosil

A possibility to define a binary operation over the space of pairs of belief functions, inverse or dual to the well-known Dempster combination rule in the same sense in which substraction is dual with respect to the addition operation in the space of real numbers, can be taken as an important problem for the purely algebraic as well as from the application point of view. Or, it offers a way how to eliminate the modification of a belief function obtained when combining this original belief function with other pieces of information, later proved not to be reliable. In the space of classical belief functions definable by set-valued (generalized) random variables defined on a probability space, the invertibility problem for belief functions, resulting from the above mentioned problem of "dual" combination rule, can be proved to be unsolvable up to trivial cases. However, when generalizing the notion of belief functions in such a way that probability space is replaced by more general measurable space with signed measure, inverse belief functions can be defined for a large class of belief functions generalized in the corresponding way. "Dual" combination rule is then defined by the application of the Dempster rule to the inverse belief functions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document