scholarly journals EXISTENCE CONDITIONS OF THE OPTIMAL STOPPING TIME : THE CASES OF GEOMETRIC BROWNIAN MOTION AND ARITHMETIC BROWNIAN MOTION

2004 ◽  
Vol 47 (3) ◽  
pp. 145-162
Author(s):  
Hajime Takatsuka
2005 ◽  
Vol 42 (03) ◽  
pp. 826-838 ◽  
Author(s):  
X. Guo ◽  
J. Liu

Consider a geometric Brownian motion X t (ω) with drift. Suppose that there is an independent source that sends signals at random times τ 1 < τ 2 < ⋯. Upon receiving each signal, a decision has to be made as to whether to stop or to continue. Stopping at time τ will bring a reward S τ , where S t = max(max0≤u≤t X u , s) for some constant s ≥ X 0. The objective is to choose an optimal stopping time to maximize the discounted expected reward E[e−r τ i S τ i | X 0 = x, S 0 = s], where r is a discount factor. This problem can be viewed as a randomized version of the Bermudan look-back option pricing problem. In this paper, we derive explicit solutions to this optimal stopping problem, assuming that signal arrival is a Poisson process with parameter λ. Optimal stopping rules are differentiated by the frequency of the signal process. Specifically, there exists a threshold λ* such that if λ>λ*, the optimal stopping problem is solved via the standard formulation of a ‘free boundary’ problem and the optimal stopping time τ * is governed by a threshold a * such that τ * = inf{τ n : X τ n ≤a * S τ n }. If λ≤λ* then it is optimal to stop immediately a signal is received, i.e. at τ * = τ 1. Mathematically, it is intriguing that a smooth fit is critical in the former case while irrelevant in the latter.


2005 ◽  
Vol 42 (3) ◽  
pp. 826-838 ◽  
Author(s):  
X. Guo ◽  
J. Liu

Consider a geometric Brownian motion Xt(ω) with drift. Suppose that there is an independent source that sends signals at random times τ1 < τ2 < ⋯. Upon receiving each signal, a decision has to be made as to whether to stop or to continue. Stopping at time τ will bring a reward Sτ, where St = max(max0≤u≤tXu, s) for some constant s ≥ X0. The objective is to choose an optimal stopping time to maximize the discounted expected reward E[e−rτiSτi | X0 = x, S0 = s], where r is a discount factor. This problem can be viewed as a randomized version of the Bermudan look-back option pricing problem. In this paper, we derive explicit solutions to this optimal stopping problem, assuming that signal arrival is a Poisson process with parameter λ. Optimal stopping rules are differentiated by the frequency of the signal process. Specifically, there exists a threshold λ* such that if λ>λ*, the optimal stopping problem is solved via the standard formulation of a ‘free boundary’ problem and the optimal stopping time τ* is governed by a threshold a* such that τ* = inf{τn: Xτn≤a*Sτn}. If λ≤λ* then it is optimal to stop immediately a signal is received, i.e. at τ* = τ1. Mathematically, it is intriguing that a smooth fit is critical in the former case while irrelevant in the latter.


1998 ◽  
Vol 35 (04) ◽  
pp. 856-872 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. E. Graversen ◽  
G. Peskir

Explicit formulas are found for the payoff and the optimal stopping strategy of the optimal stopping problem supτ E (max0≤t≤τ X t − c τ), where X = (X t ) t≥0 is geometric Brownian motion with drift μ and volatility σ &gt; 0, and the supremum is taken over all stopping times for X. The payoff is shown to be finite, if and only if μ &lt; 0. The optimal stopping time is given by τ* = inf {t &gt; 0 | X t = g * (max0≤t≤s X s )} where s ↦ g *(s) is the maximal solution of the (nonlinear) differential equation under the condition 0 &lt; g(s) &lt; s, where Δ = 1 − 2μ / σ2 and K = Δ σ2 / 2c. The estimate is established g *(s) ∼ ((Δ − 1) / K Δ)1 / Δ s 1−1/Δ as s → ∞. Applying these results we prove the following maximal inequality: where τ may be any stopping time for X. This extends the well-known identity E (sup t&gt;0 X t ) = 1 − (σ 2 / 2 μ) and is shown to be sharp. The method of proof relies upon a smooth pasting guess (for the Stephan problem with moving boundary) and the Itô–Tanaka formula (being applied two-dimensionally). The key point and main novelty in our approach is the maximality principle for the moving boundary (the optimal stopping boundary is the maximal solution of the differential equation obtained by a smooth pasting guess). We think that this principle is by itself of theoretical and practical interest.


1998 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 856-872 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. E. Graversen ◽  
G. Peskir

Explicit formulas are found for the payoff and the optimal stopping strategy of the optimal stopping problem supτE (max0≤t≤τXt − c τ), where X = (Xt)t≥0 is geometric Brownian motion with drift μ and volatility σ > 0, and the supremum is taken over all stopping times for X. The payoff is shown to be finite, if and only if μ < 0. The optimal stopping time is given by τ* = inf {t > 0 | Xt = g* (max0≤t≤sXs)} where s ↦ g*(s) is the maximal solution of the (nonlinear) differential equation under the condition 0 < g(s) < s, where Δ = 1 − 2μ / σ2 and K = Δ σ2 / 2c. The estimate is established g*(s) ∼ ((Δ − 1) / K Δ)1 / Δs1−1/Δ as s → ∞. Applying these results we prove the following maximal inequality: where τ may be any stopping time for X. This extends the well-known identity E (supt>0Xt) = 1 − (σ 2 / 2 μ) and is shown to be sharp. The method of proof relies upon a smooth pasting guess (for the Stephan problem with moving boundary) and the Itô–Tanaka formula (being applied two-dimensionally). The key point and main novelty in our approach is the maximality principle for the moving boundary (the optimal stopping boundary is the maximal solution of the differential equation obtained by a smooth pasting guess). We think that this principle is by itself of theoretical and practical interest.


1970 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 259-286 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Bather

This paper is concerned with the general problem of choosing an optimal stopping time for a Brownian motion process, where the cost associated with any trajectory depends only on its final time and position.


1970 ◽  
Vol 2 (02) ◽  
pp. 259-286 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Bather

This paper is concerned with the general problem of choosing an optimal stopping time for a Brownian motion process, where the cost associated with any trajectory depends only on its final time and position.


2020 ◽  
Vol 81 (7) ◽  
pp. 1192-1210
Author(s):  
O.V. Zverev ◽  
V.M. Khametov ◽  
E.A. Shelemekh

1997 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 66-73 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. E. Graversen ◽  
G. Peškir

The solution is presented to all optimal stopping problems of the form supτE(G(|Β τ |) – cτ), where is standard Brownian motion and the supremum is taken over all stopping times τ for B with finite expectation, while the map G : ℝ+ → ℝ satisfies for some being given and fixed. The optimal stopping time is shown to be the hitting time by the reflecting Brownian motion of the set of all (approximate) maximum points of the map . The method of proof relies upon Wald's identity for Brownian motion and simple real analysis arguments. A simple proof of the Dubins–Jacka–Schwarz–Shepp–Shiryaev (square root of two) maximal inequality for randomly stopped Brownian motion is given as an application.


2001 ◽  
Vol 38 (01) ◽  
pp. 55-66 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. Paulsen

Let us consider n stocks with dependent price processes each following a geometric Brownian motion. We want to investigate the American perpetual put on an index of those stocks. We will provide inner and outer boundaries for its early exercise region by using a decomposition technique for optimal stopping.


2006 ◽  
Vol 43 (01) ◽  
pp. 102-113
Author(s):  
Albrecht Irle

We consider the optimal stopping problem for g(Z n ), where Z n , n = 1, 2, …, is a homogeneous Markov sequence. An algorithm, called forward improvement iteration, is presented by which an optimal stopping time can be computed. Using an iterative step, this algorithm computes a sequence B 0 ⊇ B 1 ⊇ B 2 ⊇ · · · of subsets of the state space such that the first entrance time into the intersection F of these sets is an optimal stopping time. Various applications are given.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document