scholarly journals Program Directors’ Perceptions of the CBMT Exam

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 21
Author(s):  
Anthony Meadows ◽  
Lillian Eyre

Forty-one academic program directors completed a survey eliciting their perceptions of the Certification Board for Music Therapists (CBMT) board certification exam. Survey questions concerned the meaningfulness and utility of the exam in evaluating safe and competent practice; reasons students might fail the exam; exam preparation methods; and open-ended questions that allowed participants to express specific concerns about the exam, if they had any. On average, program directors perceived the exam to be “neither effective nor ineffective” in evaluating clinical competence, with open-ended responses suggesting the majority of these faculty had a range of concerns about the exam. After categorizing and defining these concerns, reflective comments serve to stimulate discussion about the meaningfulness and utility of the exam, as it is currently constructed.

2007 ◽  
Vol 64 (13) ◽  
pp. 1415-1421 ◽  
Author(s):  
Noelle E. Daugherty ◽  
Melody Ryan ◽  
Frank Romanelli ◽  
Kelly M. Smith

Author(s):  
David Greenky ◽  
Pranav Reddy ◽  
Paul George

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (03) ◽  
pp. 483-486 ◽  
Author(s):  
Natalie M. Pageler ◽  
Peter L. Elkin ◽  
Joseph Kannry ◽  
Michael G. Leu ◽  
Bruce Levy ◽  
...  

AbstractIn 2013, the American Board of Preventive Medicine (ABPM) and the American Board of Pathology (ABPath) offered the first board certification examination in Clinical Informatics to eligible physicians in the United States. In 2022, the Practice Pathway will expire and in 2023 only candidates eligible through the Fellowship Pathway will be eligible for the board certification. To date, Clinical Informatics as a specialty has not had a regular match process and used a controlled offer-acceptance process that does not meet candidates' or programs' needs. Fellows may not be offered a position with their top choice program initially, and they may accept offers from other programs to avoid risk by ensuring that they have a fellowship position. Programs have to consider losing an applicant in the first round in the ranking of applicants. The process is open to manipulation including early agreements between program directors and candidates. In this open letter to the ABPM, program directors make the case for a third-party match and are calling on the ABPM to leverage its status as the Clinical Informatics certifying body and its existing infrastructure to implement a Clinical Informatics match.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document