scholarly journals Remarks on equilibria in dynamical systems and ergodic theory -Self-organization of MHD equilibria-

1985 ◽  
Vol 53 (4) ◽  
pp. 298-305
Author(s):  
Zensho Yoshida ◽  
Nobuyuki Inoue
Entropy ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 302 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean-Charles Delvenne

In this discussion paper we argue that category theory may play a useful role in formulating, and perhaps proving, results in ergodic theory, topogical dynamics and open systems theory (control theory). As examples, we show how to characterize Kolmogorov–Sinai, Shannon entropy and topological entropy as the unique functors to the nonnegative reals satisfying some natural conditions. We also provide a purely categorical proof of the existence of the maximal equicontinuous factor in topological dynamics. We then show how to define open systems (that can interact with their environment), interconnect them, and define control problems for them in a unified way.


2008 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 1043-1045 ◽  
Author(s):  
HIROKI SUMI

AbstractWe give a correction to the assumption of Theorems 1.12 and 2.6 in the paper [H. Sumi. Semi-hyperbolic fibered rational maps and rational semigroups. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys.26 (2006), 893–922].


2001 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 66-67
Author(s):  
Wolfgang Tschacher ◽  
Ulrich M. Junghan

Thelen et al. offer an inspiring behavior-based theory of a long-standing cognitive problem. They demonstrate how joining traditions, old (the Gestaltist field theory) and new (dynamical systems theory) may open up the path towards embodied cognition. We discuss possible next steps. Self-organization theory (synergetics) could be used to address the formation of gaze/reach attractors and their optimality, given environmental control parameters. Finally, some clinical applications of the field model are advocated.


2000 ◽  
Vol 84 (501) ◽  
pp. 573
Author(s):  
Steve Abbott ◽  
Ya. G. Sinai

2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 65-74
Author(s):  
Гавриленко ◽  
T. Gavrilenko ◽  
Еськов ◽  
Valeriy Eskov ◽  
Еськов ◽  
...  

There are several criteria in science for stationarity (stability) of different dynamical systems. The stationarity in physics, engineering and chemistry is being interpreted as matching the requirements of dx/dt=0, where x=x(t) - is the vector of system’s state, or the equality of distribution functions f(x) for different samples which characterize the system. However, in case of social or biological systems the matching of the requirements is impossible and there is a problem of specific assessment of stationary regimes of complex systems of the third type. The possibility of studying of such systems within the frame of deterministic chaos, stochastic approach and theory of chaos and self-organization is being discussed. This article explains why I.R. Prigogine refused from materialistic (in fact deterministic) approach in the description of such special systems of third type and tried to get away from the traditional science in the description of biological systems.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document