scholarly journals Age specific differences in efficacy and safety for the CYD-tetravalent dengue vaccine

2016 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 437-441 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annelies Wilder-Smith ◽  
Eduardo Massad
2020 ◽  
Vol 39 (4) ◽  
pp. e30-e36
Author(s):  
Humberto Reynales ◽  
Gabriel Carrasquilla ◽  
Betzana Zambrano ◽  
Margarita Cortés S ◽  
Tifany Machabert ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
pp. 251513552110158
Author(s):  
Danielle Tully ◽  
Carrie L. Griffiths

The objective of this manuscript was to review and evaluate the efficacy and safety data of Dengvaxia for the treatment of severe secondary dengue infection. Dengvaxia is the brand name for chimeric yellow fever-dengue-tetravalent dengue vaccine (CYD-TDV). A literature search through PubMed was conducted using the keywords ‘dengue vaccine’, ‘Dengvaxia’, ‘efficacy’ or ‘safety’. Trials were selected if they appropriately assessed vaccine efficacy or were related to the vaccine approval process for CYD-TDV. Findings from this review underline the evolution of vaccine efficacy against seroprevalence, serotypes, and various ages. There are currently no preventive measures or antiviral treatments for dengue; CYD-TDV is the first vaccine to receive US Food and Drug Administration approval. Protective responses seen with the complete administration of CYD-TDV can become a standardized tool as part of a world vaccination program.


Author(s):  
Luis Rivera ◽  
Shibadas Biswal ◽  
Xavier Sáez-Llorens ◽  
Humberto Reynales ◽  
Eduardo López-Medina ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Takeda’s live attenuated tetravalent dengue vaccine candidate (TAK-003) is under evaluation in a long-term clinical trial across eight dengue-endemic countries. Previously, we have reported its efficacy and safety in both seronegative and seropositive participants and that its performance varies by serotype, with some decline in efficacy from first to second year post-vaccination. This exploratory analysis provides an update with cumulative and third year data. Methods Healthy 4–16 year-olds (n=20,099) were randomized 2:1 to receive TAK-003 or placebo (0, 3 month schedule). The protocol included baseline serostatus testing of all participants and detection of all symptomatic dengue throughout the trial with a serotype specific RT-PCR. Results Cumulative efficacy after three years was 62.0% (95% confidence interval: 56.6%, 66.7%) against virologically-confirmed dengue (VCD) and 83.6% (76.8%, 88.4%) against hospitalized VCD. Efficacy was 54.3% (41.9%, 64.1%) against VCD and 77.1% (58.6%, 87.3%) against hospitalized VCD in baseline seronegatives, and 65.0% (58.9%, 70.1%) against VCD and 86.0% (78.4%, 91.0%) against hospitalized VCD in seropositives. Efficacy against VCD during the third year declined to 44.7% (32.5%, 54.7%), while efficacy against hospitalized VCD was sustained at 70.8% (49.6%, 83.0%). Rates of serious adverse events were 2.9% in TAK-003 group and 3.5% in placebo group during the ongoing long-term follow-up (i.e. second half of the three years following vaccination), but none were related. No important safety risks were identified. Conclusions TAK-003 was efficacious against symptomatic dengue over three years. Efficacy declined over time but remained robust against hospitalized dengue. A booster dose evaluation is planned.


The Lancet ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 384 (9951) ◽  
pp. 1358-1365 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Rosario Capeding ◽  
Ngoc Huu Tran ◽  
Sri Rezeki S Hadinegoro ◽  
Hussain Imam HJ Muhammad Ismail ◽  
Tawee Chotpitayasunondh ◽  
...  

2001 ◽  
Vol 120 (5) ◽  
pp. A572-A572
Author(s):  
F JABOLI ◽  
E RODA ◽  
C FABBRI ◽  
S MARCHETTO ◽  
F FERRARA ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document