scholarly journals Influence on Probe Reaction Time of Rhythmic Stabilization during Sitting

2010 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 443-445
Author(s):  
Ming Huo ◽  
Ke Yin ◽  
Desheng Li ◽  
Hitoshi Maruyama ◽  
Sumikazu Akiyama
2014 ◽  
Vol 36 (4) ◽  
pp. 366-374 ◽  
Author(s):  
Danielle Adams ◽  
Kelly J. Ashford ◽  
Robin C. Jackson

The effect of priming on the speed and accuracy of skilled performance and on a probe-reaction time task designed to measure residual attentional capacity, was assessed. Twenty-four skilled soccer players completed a dribbling task under three prime conditions (fluency, skill-focus, and neutral) and a control condition. Results revealed changes in trial completion time and secondary task performance in line with successfully priming autonomous and skill-focused attention. Retention test data for task completion time and probe-reaction time indicated a linear decrease in the priming effect such that the effect was nonsignificant after 30 min. Results provide further support for the efficacy of priming and provide the first evidence of concurrent changes in attentional demands, consistent with promoting or disrupting automatic skill execution.


2009 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 311-316 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ming Hu ◽  
Hitoshi Maruyama ◽  
Sumikazu Akiyama

1993 ◽  
Vol 29 (Supplement) ◽  
pp. 528-529
Author(s):  
Kazuo KUROSAWA ◽  
Taizo SHIOMI ◽  
Osamu OKAI ◽  
Akihiro NAKAYAMA ◽  
Hitoshi MARUYAMA

1977 ◽  
Vol 44 (3) ◽  
pp. 847-856
Author(s):  
Jon S. Matthew ◽  
James R. Antes

Processing demands in the Sperling (1960) whole- and partial-report tasks were evaluated with the simple reaction-time probe procedure. 6 subjects responded to a buzzer probe presented at various temporal locations in the processing interval associated with performance in whole or partial report. The results showed relative increases in processing demands in partial report in the temporal vicinity (± 200 msec.) of the delivery of the auditory indicator cue as indicated by increases in probe reaction-time. Furthermore, reacting to the probe during this interval interfered with partial-report performance. This mutual interference was not detected when whole report was performed concurrently with the probe task. The results were interpreted in terms of an analysis of central processing capacity.


2006 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-16
Author(s):  
Huilin LIU ◽  
Ming HUO ◽  
Hitoshi MARUYAMA

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document