scholarly journals Soil quality indicators under management systems in a Quilombola community in the Brazilian Cerrado

2019 ◽  
Vol 76 (6) ◽  
pp. 518-526 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio Marcos Miranda Silva ◽  
Maria Lucrecia Gerosa Ramos ◽  
Robervone Severina de Melo Pereira do Nascimento ◽  
Alberto do Nascimento Silva ◽  
Stefany Braz Silva ◽  
...  
2016 ◽  
Vol 51 (9) ◽  
pp. 1643-1651 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diane Cristina Stefanoski ◽  
Cícero Célio de Figueiredo ◽  
Glenio Guimarães Santos ◽  
Robélio Leandro Marchão

Abstract The objective of this work was to assess soil quality indicators obtained with different datasets to compare soil management systems in the Brazilian Cerrado. Three criteria were used to select soil physical, chemical, and biological indicators: the full set of indicators obtained, with 36 parameters, for which all the physical, chemical, and biological soil properties were determined; a subset of indicators selected by principal component analysis (20 parameters); and a subset of indicators with some frequency of use in the literature (16 parameters). These indicators were obtained from the following management systems: no-tillage, conventional tillage, and native cerrado vegetation. Soil samples were collected at 0.0-0.1-m soil depth, and soil quality indicators were subjected to analysis of variance and their means were compared. The incorporation of soil native cerrado into agriculture decreased soil quality. The most commonly used indicators in the scientific literature are sensitive enough to detect differences in soil quality according to land use. Therefore, the selection of a minimum set of representative data can be more useful than a complex set of properties to compare management systems as to their soil quality.


2017 ◽  
Vol 248 ◽  
pp. 123-135 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mina Kiani ◽  
Guillermo Hernandez-Ramirez ◽  
Sylvie Quideau ◽  
Elwin Smith ◽  
Henry Janzen ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 657 ◽  
pp. 457-465 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcelo de Andrade Barbosa ◽  
Rener Luciano de Sousa Ferraz ◽  
Edson Luiz Mendes Coutinho ◽  
André Mendes Coutinho Neto ◽  
Marcio Silveira da Silva ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 219-232
Author(s):  
Antônio W. O. Rocha Junior ◽  
Guilherme A. H. A. Loureiro ◽  
Quintino R. Araujo ◽  
George A. Sodré ◽  
Arlicélio Q. Paiva ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melku Dagnachew ◽  
Awdenegest Moges ◽  
Asfaw Kebede ◽  
Adane Abebe

Land degradation is a global negative environmental process that causes the decline in the productivity of land resources’ capacity to perform their functions. Though soil and water conservation (SWC) technologies have been adopted in Geshy subcatchment, their effects on soil quality were limitedly studied. The study was conducted to evaluate the effects SWC measures on soil quality indicators in Geshy subcatchment, Gojeb River Catchment, Ethiopia. A total of 54 soil samples (two treatments–farmlands with and without SWC measures ∗ three slope classes ∗ three terrace positions ∗ three replications) were collected at a depth of 20 cm. Statistical differences in soil quality indicators were analyzed using multivariate analysis of variance (ANOVA) following the general linear model procedure of SPSS Version 20.0 for Windows. Means that exhibited significant differences were compared using Tukey’s honest significance difference at 5% probability level. The studied soils are characterized by low bulk density, slightly acidic with clay and clay loam texture. The results revealed that farmlands with SWC measures had significantly improved soil physical (silt and clay fractions, and volumetric soil water content (VSWC)) and chemical (pH, SOC, TN, C : N ratio, and Av. phosphorus) quality indicators as compared with farmlands without SWC measures. The significantly higher VSWC, clay, SOC, TN, C : N ratio, and Av. P at the bottom slope classes and terrace positions could be attributed to the erosion reduction and deposition effects of SWC measures. Generally, the status of the studied soils is low in SOC contents, TN, C : N ratio, and Av. P (deficient). Thus, integral use of both physical and biological SWC options and agronomic interventions would have paramount importance in improving soil quality for better agricultural production and productivity.


2009 ◽  
Vol 40 (1-6) ◽  
pp. 419-434 ◽  
Author(s):  
Evangelia Vavoulidou ◽  
Elisabeth Avramides ◽  
Martin Wood ◽  
Polykarpos Lolos

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document