scholarly journals Infectious keratitis in patients undergoing Boston Type 1 keratoprosthesis (Boston KPro) procedure: case series

2011 ◽  
Vol 74 (2) ◽  
pp. 127-129 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heloisa Moraes do Nascimento ◽  
Lauro Augusto de Oliveira ◽  
Ana Luisa Höfling-Lima
Cornea ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 31 (10) ◽  
pp. 1128-1134 ◽  
Author(s):  
Clara C. Chan ◽  
Edward J. Holland

2020 ◽  
pp. bjophthalmol-2020-316369
Author(s):  
Swapna S Shanbhag ◽  
Sirisha Senthil ◽  
Ashik Mohamed ◽  
Sayan Basu

PurposeTo analyse the outcomes of keratoprosthesis in eyes with limbal stem cell deficiency (LSCD) and to compare the outcomes in two different keratoprosthesis devices.MethodsThis was a single-centre retrospective comparative case series which included 81 eyes of patients with severe bilateral corneal blindness secondary to LSCD. The patients underwent either Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis (Boston Kpro, n=44) or Aurolab keratoprosthesis (AuroKpro, n=37) implantation. The primary outcome measures of anatomical retention and functional recovery of 20/200 or better visual acuity at yearly time points until 5 years of follow-up were compared between the two groups.ResultsThe most common indication overall was chemical injury (64.2%). Anatomical retention rates were similar in the Boston Kpro (30/44, 68.2%) and AuroKpro (23/37, 62.2%) groups (p=0.89). Kaplan-Meier survival rates at 5 years of follow-up were greater for the Boston Kpro group with respect to both anatomical retention (58.51%±9% vs 43.8±12%; p=0.23) as well as functional recovery (42.61%±8% vs 35.03±10%; p=0.9); these differences were not statistically significant. Overall, the most common complication was new-onset glaucoma (59%; 48/81). The difference in incidence rate of this complication was not statistically significant among the two groups (p=0.09).ConclusionKeratoprosthesis is an effective treatment option for patients with corneal blindness secondary to LSCD. In a setting where LSCD is a common cause of corneal blindness, the AuroKpro, when available can be considered an alternative to the Boston Kpro to achieve anatomical and functional success in patients who otherwise would not have access to this device.


Cornea ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Reza Ghaffari ◽  
Clemence Bonnet ◽  
Madeline Yung ◽  
Cristina Bostan ◽  
Mona Harissi-Dagher ◽  
...  

Diagnostics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (7) ◽  
pp. 1151
Author(s):  
Pedro Romero-Aroca ◽  
Raul Navarro-Gil ◽  
Albert Feliu ◽  
Aida Valls ◽  
Antonio Moreno ◽  
...  

Background: To measure the relationship between variability in HbA1c and microalbuminuria (MA) and diabetic retinopathy (DR) in the long term. Methods: A prospective case-series study, was conducted on 366 Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus patients with normoalbuminuria and without diabetic retinopathy at inclusion. The cohort was followed for a period of 12 years. The Cox survival analysis was used for the multivariate statistical study. The effect of variability in microangiopathy (retinopathy and nephropathy) was evaluated by calculating the standard deviation of HbA1c (SD-HbA1c), the coefficient of variation of HbA1c (CV-HbA1c), average real variability (ARV-HbA1c) and variability irrespective of the mean (VIM-HbA1c) adjusted for the other known variables. Results: A total of 106 patients developed diabetic retinopathy (29%) and 73 microalbuminuria (19.9%). Overt diabetic nephropathy, by our definition, affected only five patients (1.36%). Statistical results show that the current age, mean HbA1c, SD-HbA1c and ARV-HbA1c are significant in the development of diabetic retinopathy. Microalbuminuria was significant for current age, mean HbA1c, CV-HbA1c and ARV-HbA1c. Conclusions: By measuring the variability in HbA1c, we can use SD-HbA1c and ARV-HbA1c as possible targets for judging which patients are at risk of developing DR and MA, and CV-HbA1c as the target for severe DR.


2021 ◽  
pp. 004947552199849
Author(s):  
Prakriti Shukla ◽  
Kiran Preet Malhotra ◽  
Parul Verma ◽  
Swastika Suvirya ◽  
Abir Saraswat ◽  
...  

Non-neuropathic ulcers in leprosy patients are infrequently seen, and atypical presentations are prone to misdiagnosis. We evaluated diagnosed cases of leprosy between January 2017 and January 2020 for the presence of cutaneous ulceration, Ridley–Jopling subtype of leprosy, reactions and histologic features of these ulcerations. Treatment was given as WHO recommended multi-bacillary multi-drug therapy. We found 17/386 leprosy patients with non-neuropathic ulcers. We describe three causes – spontaneous cutaneous ulceration in lepromatous leprosy (one nodular and one diffuse), lepra reactions (five patients with type 1; nine with type 2, further categorised into ulcerated Sweet syndrome-like who also had pseudoepitheliomatous hyperplasia, pustulo-necrotic and necrotic erythema nodosum leprosum) and Lucio phenomenon (one patient). Our series draws attention towards the different faces of non-neuropathic ulcers in leprosy, including some atypical and novel presentations.


2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ya-Bing Wang ◽  
Ou Wang ◽  
Min Nie ◽  
Yan Jiang ◽  
Mei Li ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Autoimmune polyendocrine syndrome type 1 (APS1) is a hereditary disease caused by mutations in the AIRE gene with both endocrine and non-endocrine organ involvement. The existing data from China are limited, and this study aims to describe the phenotypes and genetic characterization in Chinese APS1 patients. In this single-center, retrospective, observational study, comprehensive endocrine and extra-endocrine manifestations were collected, and genetic analysis in AIRE was conducted in patients with APS1 between the years of 1984 and 2018 at Peking Union Medical College Hospital. Results In total, 13 patients from 12 unrelated families were enrolled, seven of whom were female, with hypoparathyroidism, chronic mucocutaneous candidiasis, and Addison’s disease being the most frequently observed manifestations. Up to 84.7% presented with two or three of the above-mentioned manifestations, and nearly 4.9 ± 1.8 components presented in patients aged 21.2 ± 7.9 years old. Several less common phenotypes, such as myeloproliferative disease, pure red cell aplasia, renal tubular acidosis, asplenia, autoimmune hepatitis, and ankylosing spondylitis, were also observed in patients. Altogether, seven different AIRE mutations were found in six patients, four of which (K161fs, G208V, A246fs, and L308F) had not been previously reported in patients with APS1. Conclusion We have provided a comprehensive profile of Chinese patients with APS1, with less commonly observed features being observed in addition to more regularly seen manifestations. Additionally, different AIRE mutations that were observed have expanded the genetic spectrum, which will help with future understanding of the molecular pathogenesis of APS1.


2021 ◽  
pp. bjophthalmol-2020-317483
Author(s):  
Jonathan El-Khoury ◽  
Majd Mustafa ◽  
Roy Daoud ◽  
Mona Harissi-Dagher

Background/aimsTo evaluate the time needed for patients with Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis (KPro) to reach their best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and all contributing factors.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed 137 consecutive eyes from 118 patients, measured how long they needed to reach their BCVA and looked at factors that might affect this time duration including patient demographics, ocular comorbidities and postoperative complications.ResultsThe mean follow-up was 5.49 years. The median time to BCVA postoperatively was 6 months, with 47% of patients achieving their BCVA by 3 months. The mean best achieved logMAR visual acuity was 0.71, representing a gain of 6 lines on the Snellen visual acuity chart. Postoperative glaucoma, retroprosthetic membrane (RPM) and endophthalmitis prolonged this duration. We found no correlation between the following factors and time to BCVA: gender, age, indication for KPro surgery, primary versus secondary KPro, number of previous penetrating keratoplasties, previous retinal surgery, intraoperative anterior vitrectomy and preoperative glaucoma.ConclusionIn our retrospective cohort, the majority of subjects reached their BCVA between 3 and 6 months after KPro implantation. This duration was significantly prolonged by the development of postoperative glaucoma, RPM and endophthalmitis.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document