scholarly journals Cheating interactions favor modularity in mutualistic networks

Author(s):  
Lucas Arantes Camacho ◽  
Cecilia Siliansky de Andreazzi ◽  
Lucas P Medeiros ◽  
Irina B Barros ◽  
Carine Emer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ecology ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 85 (3) ◽  
pp. 875-878 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathleen M. Kay ◽  
Douglas W. Schemske

Nature ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 458 (7241) ◽  
pp. 1018-1020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ugo Bastolla ◽  
Miguel A. Fortuna ◽  
Alberto Pascual-García ◽  
Antonio Ferrera ◽  
Bartolo Luque ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2018 ◽  
Vol 115 (47) ◽  
pp. 12017-12022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucas P. Medeiros ◽  
Guilherme Garcia ◽  
John N. Thompson ◽  
Paulo R. Guimarães

Ecological interactions shape adaptations through coevolution not only between pairs of species but also through entire multispecies assemblages. Local coevolution can then be further altered through spatial processes that have been formally partitioned in the geographic mosaic theory of coevolution. A major current challenge is to understand the spatial patterns of coadaptation that emerge across ecosystems through the interplay between gene flow and selection in networks of interacting species. Here, we combine a coevolutionary model, network theory, and empirical information on species interactions to investigate how gene flow and geographical variation in selection affect trait patterns in mutualistic networks. We show that gene flow has the surprising effect of favoring trait matching, especially among generalist species in species-rich networks typical of pollination and seed dispersal interactions. Using an analytical approximation of our model, we demonstrate that gene flow promotes trait matching by making the adaptive landscapes of different species more similar to each other. We use this result to show that the progressive loss of gene flow associated with habitat fragmentation may undermine coadaptation in mutualisms. Our results therefore provide predictions of how spatial processes shape the evolution of species-rich interactions and how the widespread fragmentation of natural landscapes may modify the coevolutionary process.


2009 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 196-202 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. A. Chamberlain ◽  
J. N. Holland

PLoS ONE ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 6 (11) ◽  
pp. e27280 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mathias M. Pires ◽  
Paulo I. Prado ◽  
Paulo R. Guimarães

Author(s):  
Jordi Bascompte ◽  
Pedro Jordano

Mutualisms can involve dozens, even hundreds, of species and this complexity has precluded a serious community-wide approach to plant–animal interactions. The most straightforward way to describe such an interacting community is with a network of interactions. In this approach, species are represented as nodes of two types: plants and animals. This chapter provides the tools and concepts for characterizing mutualistic networks and placing them into a broad context. This serves as a background with which to understand the structure of mutualistic networks. The discussions cover a network approach to complex systems, measures of network structure, models of network buildup, and ecological networks.


2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 (3) ◽  
pp. 033502
Author(s):  
Seong Eun Maeng ◽  
Jae Woo Lee ◽  
Deok-Sun Lee

Ecology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 101 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mathias M. Pires ◽  
James L. O'Donnell ◽  
Laura A. Burkle ◽  
Cecilia Díaz‐Castelazo ◽  
David H. Hembry ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document