Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services in a Changing Climate

2009 ◽  
pp. 124-131
Author(s):  
2019 ◽  
Vol 51 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Laila Shahzad ◽  
Arifa Tahir ◽  
Faiza Sharif ◽  
Ikram Ul Haq ◽  
Hamid Mukhtar

Author(s):  
Smita Chaudhry ◽  
Gagan Preet Singh Sidhu ◽  
Rashmi Paliwal

Author(s):  
Daniel El Chami

In the last few decades, a great deal has been written on the use of sustainable agriculture to improve the resilience of ecosystem services to climate change. However, no tangible and systematic evidence exists on how this agriculture would participate in alleviating impacts on vulnerable rural communities. This paper provides a narrative systematic review (SR) integrated with a bibliometric analysis and a concept network analysis to determine how, in this changing climate, sustainable agriculture can increase the resilience of agrosystems. Our search ranged from the date of the first relevant article until the end of 2018.


Author(s):  
Christina J. Wang ◽  
J. Michael Hudson ◽  
Géraldine Lassalle ◽  
Timothy A. Whitesel

2019 ◽  
Vol 280 ◽  
pp. 53-67 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adina Chain-Guadarrama ◽  
Alejandra Martínez-Salinas ◽  
Natalia Aristizábal ◽  
Taylor H. Ricketts

2017 ◽  
Vol 39 (6) ◽  
pp. 477 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suzanne M. Prober ◽  
Kristen J. Williams ◽  
Linda M. Broadhurst ◽  
Veronica A. J. Doerr

Principles underpinning the goals of nature conservation and ecological restoration have traditionally involved preventing ecological change or restoring ecosystems or populations towards preferred historical states. Under global climate change, it is increasingly recognised that this may no longer be achievable, but there has been limited debate regarding new principles that can help guide goal-setting for nature conservation and ecological restoration in dynamic environments. To stimulate such debate, we established a framework of human motivations implicit in historically focussed nature conservation approaches. We drew on this and a literature survey to propose a palette of five principles to guide goal-setting for nature conservation and ecological restoration in a changing climate. Our framework proposes three broad sets of human motivations relevant to nature conservation: (1) basic survival and material needs (akin to provisioning and regulating ecosystem services), (2) psychological and cultural needs such as a sense of place (reflecting cultural ecosystem services), and (3) the need to fulfil moral or ethical obligations (e.g. intergenerational and interspecies equity). Meeting basic needs for current and future generations is supported by a commonly proposed principle to optimise ecological processes and functions (Principle 1); which in turn is dependent on maintaining the ongoing evolutionary potential in the world’s biota (Principle 2). Beyond this, motivations relating to psychological, cultural and moral needs demand not only an emphasis on healthy ecosystem functioning, but on the character and diversity of the ecosystems and species that contribute to these functions. Our subsequent three principles, minimise native species losses (Principle 3), maintain the evolutionary character and biogeographic structuring of the biota (Principle 4), and maintain wild natural ecosystems (Principle 5) contribute to these further goals. Although these principles can sometimes be conflicting, we argue that by connecting directly with underlying motivations, this broader palette will help take us forward towards more effective nature conservation in a rapidly changing world.


2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana Sofia Vaz ◽  
Marisa Graça ◽  
Cláudia Carvalho-Santos ◽  
Eva Pinto ◽  
Joana R. Vicente ◽  
...  

How institutional stakeholders perceive the supply and demand of ecosystem services (ES) under distinct contexts determines which planning actions are deemed priority or not. Public officers play a crucial role in social-ecological management and decision-making processes, but there is a paucity of research exploring their perceptions on ES supply and demand under a changing climate. We address this gap through an exploratory study that analyses the views of public officers on the potential impacts of climate-change related drivers on multiple ES in a major administrative region from Portugal (EU NUTS 3). We combined qualitative spatial data from participatory maps and semi-quantitative answers from questionnaire-based surveys with 22 officers from public institutions contributing to territorial planning. Contrary to other similar studies, public officers shared a common view on the importance of ES. This view aligns with scientific projections on how a changing climate is expected to influence ES in the region over the next decade. In agreement with other observations in Mediterranean regions, the most perceivably valued ES concerned tangible socio-economic benefits (e.g., periurban agriculture and wine production). Surprisingly, despite the region’s potential for cultural ES, and considering the impacts that climate change may hold on them, recreation and tourism did not seem to be embedded in the officers’ views. We explore the implications of our findings for territorial planning and social-ecological adaptation, considering that the way stakeholders manage the territory in response to climate change depends on the extent to which they are aware and expect to experience climatic consequences in the future.


Author(s):  
Mark Huxham ◽  
Amrit Dencer-Brown ◽  
Karen Diele ◽  
Kandasamy Kathiresan ◽  
Ivan Nagelkerken ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document