Finite-Element Study of Biomechanical Explanations for Bone Loss around Dental Implants

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-30
Author(s):  
Ali Merdji ◽  
Belaid Taharou ◽  
Rajshree Hillstrom ◽  
Ali Benaissa ◽  
Sandipan Roy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element ◽  
Bone Loss ◽  
Dental Implants ◽  
Finite Element Study ◽  
Element Study

Importance of diameter-to-length ratio in selecting dental implants: a methodological finite element study

2012 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 443-449 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. Demenko ◽  
I. Linetskiy ◽  
K. Nesvit ◽  
H. Hubalkova ◽  
V. Nesvit ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element ◽  
Dental Implants ◽  
Length Ratio ◽  
Finite Element Study ◽  
Element Study

A Finite Element Study of Short Dental Implants in the Posterior Maxilla

2014 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. e147-e154 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rudi C. van Staden ◽  
Xiaona Li ◽  
Hong Guan ◽  
Newell W. Johnson ◽  
Peter Reher ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element ◽  
Dental Implants ◽  
Finite Element Study ◽  
Posterior Maxilla ◽  
Element Study

Influence of graft quality and marginal bone loss on implants placed in maxillary grafted sinus: a finite element study

2010 ◽  
Vol 48 (7) ◽  
pp. 681-689 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samroeng Inglam ◽  
Siriwan Suebnukarn ◽  
Wichit Tharanon ◽  
Tratat Apatananon ◽  
Kriskrai Sitthiseripratip
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element ◽  
Bone Loss ◽  
Marginal Bone Loss ◽  
Finite Element Study ◽  
Graft Quality ◽  
Element Study

A Finite Element Study of the Effect of Contact Forces Between an Implant-Retained Crown and its Adjacent Teeth on Bone Stresses

2009 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 441-450 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Chaichanasiri ◽  
P. Nanakorn ◽  
W. Tharanon ◽  
J. Vander Sloten
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element ◽  
Dental Implants ◽  
Dental Implant ◽  
Contact Analysis ◽  
Contact Forces ◽  
Finite Element Study ◽  
Single Tooth ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Single Tooth Implant ◽  
Element Study

ABSTRACTMost of finite element (FE) models used to study single tooth dental implants consider only an isolated implant. It is of course more realistic to model also the adjacent teeth of the implant. However, including the adjacent teeth significantly increases the complexity of the model and necessitates the complex contact analysis. The main difference between the FE models with and without the adjacent teeth is that the model without the adjacent teeth cannot capture the effect of the contact forces that are transferred between the implant-retained crown and the adjacent teeth. In this study, the hypothesis that the contact forces are not important is verified by the FE contact analysis. Realistic 3D FE models of a mandible and a single tooth implant with and without adjacent teeth are constructed and analyzed. It is found from the results that the difference between the maximum bone stresses of the two models is very small when various loading directions are considered. The obtained results, therefore, indicate that the effect of contact forces between a dental implant and its adjacent teeth is not significant. Consequently, the adjacent teeth can be excluded from FE models if various loading directions are considered.

scholarly journals Stress Distribution Around Single Short Dental Implants: A Finite Element Study

2014 ◽  
Vol 14 (S1) ◽  
pp. 161-167 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Vidya Bhat ◽  
Priyanka Premkumar ◽  
K. Kamalakanth Shenoy
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element ◽  
Stress Distribution ◽  
Dental Implants ◽  
Finite Element Study ◽  
Element Study
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document