Materiality, Documentary Authority, and the Circulation of the Katherine Group

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-50
Author(s):  
Jenny C. Bledsoe

Written in the decades before Ancrene Wisse, the Early Middle English hagiographies of the Katherine Group depict three virgin martyrs, Katherine, Margaret, and Juliana. Using touch and eyewitness accounts as measures of proof, the legend equates St. Margaret’s body with the textual corpus inscribed on animal hide. The manuscript’s documentary authority is verified through proximity to the holy body of the saint, and, in a similarly body-centred (and precarious) authority, the anchoress functions as the centre of an ephemeral textual community in the early thirteenth century. The Katherine Group narratives and codicological evidence indicate an anchoritic-lay literary culture operating adjacent to clerical manuscript culture, consistent with Catherine Innes-Parker’s theory about co-existing informal and formal vernacular textual cultures in the West Midlands. This “informal,” or ephemeral, textual community shaped lay literacy and manuscript use, including perceptions about the documentary authority of vernacular textual artifacts.

1970 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 66
Author(s):  
James A. Corbett ◽  
R. H. Hilton

Author(s):  
Wendy Scase

London, British Library, MS Additional 37787, a volume of prayers and other devotions and related material, was part-edited by Nita S. Baugh as A Worcestershire Miscellany Compiled by John Northwood c. 1400 (1956). Baugh’s title was based on ownership inscriptions of John Northwood, monk at Bordesley Abbey, Worcestershire, and members of the Throckmorton family also of Worcestershire. These associations have made the manuscript an important witness in narratives about Cistercian participation in the production and circulation of Middle English verse manuscripts in the West Midlands and the role of monasteries in fostering vernacular writing and book production, including the Vernon and Simeon manuscripts. This chapter proposes that this view is called into question by careful codicological examination of the volume. Through challenging these propositions it suggests alternative ways to explore and explain the production of books containing vernacular prayers and devotions in late medieval England.


1927 ◽  
Vol os-III (10) ◽  
pp. 186-203
Author(s):  
MARY S. SERJEANTSON

1970 ◽  
Vol 136 (1) ◽  
pp. 106
Author(s):  
F. V. Emery ◽  
R. H. Hilton ◽  
Bryan Waites

1967 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 555
Author(s):  
Edward Miller ◽  
R. H. Hilton

1927 ◽  
Vol os-III (9) ◽  
pp. 54-67 ◽  
Author(s):  
MARY S. SERJEANTSON

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document