scholarly journals Arthroscopic Repair of Acute Bony Bankart Lesions: An Analysis of Risk Factors for Instability Recurrence

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (6) ◽  
pp. 1382-1389
Author(s):  
Jose Mar韆 Silberberg Mui駉 ◽  
◽  
Alessandro Nilo Fulvi
2013 ◽  
Vol 42 (1) ◽  
pp. 86-94 ◽  
Author(s):  
Young-Kyu Kim ◽  
Seung-Hyun Cho ◽  
Won-Su Son ◽  
Sung-Hoon Moon

2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 201-206 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nasir Shah ◽  
Muhammed Nasir Nadiri ◽  
Emma Torrance ◽  
Lennard Funk

Background The present study aimed to report the outcomes of acute and subacute arthroscopic bony Bankart repairs in collision athletes. Methods We reviewed 22 consecutive rugby players with traumatic anterior glenohumeral instability who underwent arthroscopic bony Bankart repair within 4 months of injury over a 2-year period. All lesions were less than 25% of the glenoid bony area. Results A significant improvement was noted at three months and was maintained at 28 months postoperatively. The mean Constant score improved from 61.5 to 84.1, the mean Oxford shoulder score decreased from 26.3 to 13.6 and the mean Oxford instability score decreased from 42.9 to 13.5. The mean satisfaction score was 8.3 out of 10 at final follow-up. All patients returned to their pre-injury sporting level. Twenty patients (91%) remained stable and asymptomatic, although two (9%) had recurrent instability after further traumatic sports injuries. One required a modified Latarjet procedure, whereas the other patient sustained a soft tissue Bankart lesion and had a revision arthroscopic repair. Conclusions Acute and sub-acute bony Bankart lesions in collision athletes can be addressed through arthroscopic repair with a satisfactory outcome and return to pre-injury level of sport


2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (7_suppl5) ◽  
pp. 2325967119S0043
Author(s):  
Alexander Greenstein ◽  
Alexander M. Brown ◽  
Aaron Roberts ◽  
Raymond Edward Chen ◽  
Emma Knapp ◽  
...  

Objectives: Previous studies of bony Bankart repair comparing single- and double-row reconstruction techniques have examined static forces required to displace the bony Bankart lesion. No studies, to date, have examined stability of bony Bankart repair with more physiologic concavity-compression model. We hypothesize the double-row fixation technique would provide superior stability and decreased displacement of a simulated bony Bankart lesion in a concavity-compression cadaveric model compared with single-row technique.Our aim was to examine the dynamic stability and ultimate displacement of single- vs double-row repair techniques for acute bony Bankart lesions Methods: Testing was performed on 13 matched pairs of glenoids with simulated bony Bankart fractures with a defect width of 25% of the glenoid diameter. Half of the fractures were repaired with a double-row technique, while the contralateral glenoids were repaired with a single-row technique. To determine dynamic biomechanical stability and ultimate step-off of the repairs a 150 N load and 2000 cycles of internal-external rotation at 1 Hz was applied to specimens to simulate standard rehabilitation protocols. Toggle was quantified throughout cycling with a coordinate measuring machine. After cyclic loading, the fracture displacement was measured. 3D spatial measurements were calculated using MATLAB. Results: The double-row technique resulted in significantly (p=0.005) less displacement (mean=342.48 µm SD=300.64 µm) than single-row technique (mean=981.84 µm, SD=640.38 µm). Ultimate fracture displacement of double-row repair was significantly less (mean=792.23 µm, SD=333.85 µm, p=0.046) after simulated rehabilitation by internal-external rotation cycling compared to single-row repair (mean=1,267.38 µm, SD=640.38 µm). Conclusion: The double-row fixation technique for arthroscopic bony Bankart repair results in superior stability throughout simulated rehabilitation and decreases ultimate displacement in a concavity-compression cadaveric model.


2008 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 102-106 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyung Cheon Kim ◽  
Kwang Jin Rhee ◽  
Hyun Dae Shin

2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (6) ◽  
pp. e669-e673 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kirsten L. Poehling-Monaghan ◽  
Aaron J. Krych ◽  
Diane L. Dahm

2016 ◽  
Vol 25 (7) ◽  
pp. 2196-2204 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johannes Barth ◽  
Kevin Andrieu ◽  
Elias Fotiadis ◽  
Gerjon Hannink ◽  
Renaud Barthelemy ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document