scholarly journals PROVISIONAL ANTERIOR TOOTH REPLACEMENT USING FIBER REINFORCED ARTIFICIAL TOOTH: 3 CLINICAL REPORTS

Author(s):  
Mustafa GÜNDOĞDU ◽  
Funda BAYINDIR
2020 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. 100109
Author(s):  
Muhammad Ikbal ◽  
Acing Habibie Mude ◽  
Irfan Dammar ◽  
Nisrina Ekayani

2010 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 191-194 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bora Bagis ◽  
Ipek Satiroglu ◽  
Fatih Mehmet Korkmaz ◽  
Sabit Melih Ates

2021 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Qasim Javed

Maxillary lateral incisor is the most frequent congenitally missing anterior tooth of the permanent dentition. The absence of the anterior tooth can adversely affect the production/transmission of speech sounds, mental health, and facial aesthetics of an individual. Considering this, prosthetic rehabilitation of missing front tooth is important. The treatment alternatives include implant supported single crown, conventional fixed partial dentures (FPDs), and resin bonded FPDs that are unilaterally or bilaterally supported by metallic wings. However, with the development in adhesive dentistry fiber reinforced composite (FRC) supported FPDs have provided a workable substitute for traditional techniques because of their improved esthetics, minimal invasiveness, less cost, enhanced bond strength, and revocable nature. The current case, reports the two years follow up of twenty-four years old female patient, for whom the congenitally absent maxillary right lateral incisor was restored with FRC supported FPD. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.37.3.3873 How to cite this:Javed MQ. Fiber reinforced composite supported restoration of congenitally missing tooth by minimally invasive approach: Two years follow-up. Pak J Med Sci. 2021;37(3):---------. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.37.3.3873 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


2010 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 175-179 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mahima Tilakchand ◽  
KH Kidiyoor ◽  
R Nageshwar Rao

ABSTRACT For patients who require removal of anterior teeth due to periodontal problems there are a multitude of treatment considerations. Using the natural tooth as a pontic offers the benefits of being the right size, shape and color. This paper describes the immediate replacement of an anterior tooth using a preimpregnated fiber-reinforced composite with the natural tooth as the pontic. The abutment teeth can be preserved with minimal or no preparation, thus keeping the technique reversible, and can be completed at the chair side thereby avoiding laboratory costs. It can be used as an interim measure or as a definitive prosthesis.


Author(s):  
Sadhana A Raina ◽  
Priyanka Khode ◽  
Manjusha M Warhadpande

ABSTRACT The loss of anterior tooth can be hurtful to the patient both psychologically and socially. In adolescent patients, temporary replacement of teeth can minimize these concerns. Many approaches have been described for this temporary replacement. Adhesively luted, fiber-reinforced retained fixed partial denture (FPD) can be a clinical alternative for the replacement of missing anterior tooth in selective situations. This is an innovative alternative to conventional metal, ceramic restoration. It is especially useful for patients who cannot afford high cost of FPD and cannot devote much time (number of sittings) for the treatment. The main advantage of fiber-reinforced composite fixed prosthesis is conservative cutting of tooth. Structure and chairside fabrication of the bridge using acrylic tooth are less expensive for the patients. The purpose of this clinical study is to evaluate the clinical usefulness of the fiber-reinforced composite FPD. This report describes the clinical treatment of patients using fiber-reinforced composite. How to cite this article Raina SA, Khode P, Warhadpande MM. Conservative Approach for replacing missing Tooth using Glass Fiber-reinforced Composite. Int J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2016;6(2):47-49.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document