scholarly journals Key components of enhanced recovery after surgery protocol in lung cancer surgery

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 70-83
Author(s):  
A. K. Каchur ◽  
V. K. Lyadov
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery ◽  
Lung Cancer Surgery ◽  
Postoperative Mortality ◽  
Early Mobilization ◽  
Cancer Surgery ◽  
Thoracoscopic Approach ◽  
Thoracic Cancer ◽  
Eras Protocol

Due to the high lung cancer morbidity and the need for surgical intervention in that patient population, introduction of the concept of standard protocol for enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) may lead to a significant decrease of the rate of postoperative complications and hospital stay. The aim of the review was to assess the main components of ERAS protocol in thoracic cancer surgery using video-assisted thoracoscopic interventions (VATS). Systematic implementation of specific measures in pre- (patient consulting before the intervention, compliance with fluid and nutrition regimen, exclusion of routine sedation, prophylaxis of venous thrombosis, use of intravenous antibiotics and alcohol skin-prepping solution with chlorohexidine), intra- (prevention of hypothermia, thoracoscopic approach, single-tube approach in anatomic lung resections, exclusion of pleural tube insertion, urethral catheterization for less than 2 hours and only in case of epidural anesthesia) and postoperative (early mobilization and cessation of intravenous infusion, pain control using combination of acetaminophen with NSAIDs, maintenance of normovolemy, use of balanced crystalloid solutions and non-pharmacological measures for nausea and vomiting control) periods promote improved outcomes, decrease of postoperative complication rate and postoperative mortality

scholarly journals The impact of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol compliance on morbidity from resection for primary lung cancer

2018 ◽  
Vol 155 (4) ◽  
pp. 1843-1852 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luke J. Rogers ◽  
David Bleetman ◽  
David E. Messenger ◽  
Natasha A. Joshi ◽  
Lesley Wood ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery ◽  
Primary Lung Cancer ◽  
Protocol Compliance ◽  
Eras Protocol ◽  
The Impact

O-172 Postoperative mortality after lung cancer surgery. A population-basedstudy

Lung Cancer ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 49 ◽  
pp. S58
Author(s):  
H. Rostad ◽  
A. Naalsund ◽  
T. Strand ◽  
O. Talleraas ◽  
J. Norstein
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Lung Cancer Surgery ◽  
Postoperative Mortality ◽  
Cancer Surgery

scholarly journals Impact of enhanced recovery after surgery protocol compliance on patients’ outcome in benign hysterectomy and establishment of a predictive nomogram model

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yiwei Shen ◽  
Feng Lv ◽  
Su Min ◽  
Gangming Wu ◽  
Juying Jin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Postoperative Complications ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Postoperative Complication ◽  
Patient Experience ◽  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery ◽  
Early Mobilization ◽  
Urinary Drainage ◽  
Eras Protocol

Abstract Background Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways have been shown to improve clinical outcomes after surgery. Considering the importance of patient experience for patients with benign surgery, this study evaluated whether improved compliance with ERAS protocol modified for gynecological surgery which recommended by the ERAS Society is associated with better clinical outcomes and patient experience, and to determine the influence of compliance with each ERAS element on patients’ outcome after benign hysterectomy. Methods A prospective observational study was performed on the women who underwent hysterectomy between 2019 and 2020. A total of 475 women greater 18 years old were classified into three groups according to their per cent compliance with ERAS protocols: Group I: < 60% (148 cases); Group II:≥60 and < 80% (160 cases); Group III: ≥80% (167 cases). Primary outcome was the 30-day postoperative complications. Second outcomes included QoR-15 questionnaire scores, patient satisfaction on a scale from 1 to 7, and length of stay after operation. After multivariable binary logistic regression analyse, a nomogram model was established to predict the incidence of having a postoperative complication with individual ERAS element compliance. Results The study enrolled 585 patients, and 475 completed the follow-up assessment. Patients with compliance over 80% had a significant reduction in postoperative complications (20.4% vs 41.2% vs 38.1%, P < 0.001) and length of stay after surgery (4 vs 5 vs 4, P < 0.001). Increased compliance was also associated with higher patient satisfaction and QoR-15 scores (P < 0.001),. Among the five dimensions of the QoR-15, physical comfort (P < 0.05), physical independence (P < 0.05), and pain dimension (P < 0.05) were better in the higher compliance groups. Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) (P < 0.001), postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) prophylaxis (P < 0.001), early mobilization (P = 0.031), early oral nutrition (P = 0.012), and early removal of urinary drainage (P < 0.001) were significantly associated with less complications. Having a postoperative complication was better predicted by the proposed nomogram model with high AUC value (0.906) and sensitivity (0.948) in the cohort. Conclusions Improved compliance with the ERAS protocol was associated with improved recovery and better patient experience undergoing hysterectomy. MIS, PONV prophylaxis, early mobilization, early oral intake, and early removal of urinary drainage were of concern in reducing postoperative complications. Trial registration Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR1800019178. Registered on 30/10/2018.

scholarly journals Influence of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) on patients receiving lung resection: a retrospective study of 1749 cases

BMC Surgery ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chunmei Wang ◽  
Yutian Lai ◽  
Pengfei Li ◽  
Jianhuan Su ◽  
Guowei Che
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Logistic Regression ◽  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery ◽  
Lung Resection ◽  
Hospital Costs ◽  
Lung Cancer Surgery ◽  
Pulmonary Complications ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Postoperative Pulmonary Complications

Abstract Background The study aimed to evaluate the outcomes following the implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) for patients undergoing lung cancer surgery. Method A retrospective cohort study involving 1749 patients with lung cancer undergoing pulmonary resection was conducted. The patients were divided into two time period groups for analysis (routine pathway and ERAS pathway). Logistic regression analysis was performed to assess the risks of developing postoperative pulmonary complications. Results Among the 1749 patients, 691 were stratified into the ERAS group, and 1058 in to the routine group. The ERAS group presented with shorter postoperative in-hospital length of stay (LOS) (4.0 vs 6.0, P < 0.001), total LOS (10.0 vs. 13.0 days, P < 0.001), and lower total in-hospital costs (P < 0.001), including material (P < 0.001) and drug expenses (P < 0.001). Furthermore, the ERAS group also presented with a lower occurrence of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) than the routine group (15.2% vs. 19.5%, P = 0.022). Likewise, a significantly lower occurrence of pneumonia (8.4% vs. 14.2%, P < 0.001) and atelectasis (5.9% vs. 9.8%, P = 0.004) was found in the ERAS group. Regarding the binary logistic regression, the ERAS intervention was the sole independent factor for the occurrence of PPCs (OR: 0.601, 95% CI 0.434–0.824, P = 0.002). In addition, age (OR: 1.032, 95% CI 1.018–1.046), COPD (OR: 1.792, 95% CI 1.196–2.686), and FEV1 (OR: 0.205, 95% CI 0.125–0.339) were also independent predictors of PPCs. Conclusion Implementation of an ERAS pathway shows improved postoperative outcomes, including shortened LOS, lower in-hospital costs, and reduced occurrence of PPCs, providing benefits to the postoperative recovery of patients with lung cancer undergoing surgical treatment.

scholarly journals Influence of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) on patients receiving lung resection: a retrospective study of 1,749 cases

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chunmei Wang ◽  
Yutian Lai ◽  
Pengfei Li ◽  
Jianhua Su ◽  
Guowei Che
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Logistic Regression ◽  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery ◽  
Lung Resection ◽  
Hospital Costs ◽  
Lung Cancer Surgery ◽  
Pulmonary Complications ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Postoperative Pulmonary Complications

Abstract Background The study aimed to evaluate the outcomes following the implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) for patients undergoing lung cancer surgery.Method A retrospective cohort study involving 1,749 patients with lung cancer undergoing pulmonary resection was conducted. The patients were divided into two time period groups for analysis(routine pathway and ERAS pathway). Logistic regression analysis was performed to assess the risks of developing postoperative pulmonary complications.Results Among the 1,749 patients, 691 were stratified into the ERAS group, and 1,058 in to the routine group. The ERAS group presented with shorter postoperative in-hospital length of stay (LOS) (4.0 vs 6.0, P<0.001), total LOS (10.0 VS. 13.0 days, P<0.001), and lower total in-hospital costs (P<0.001), including material (P<0.001) and drug expenses (P<0.001). Furthermore, the ERAS group also presented with a lower occurrence of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) than the routine group (15.2% vs. 19.5%, P=0.022). Likewise, a significantly lower occurrence of pneumonia (8.4% vs. 14.2%, P<0.001) and atelectasis (5.9% vs. 9.8%, P=0.004) was found in the ERAS group. Regarding the binary logistic regression, the ERAS intervention was the sole independent factor for the occurrence of PPCs (OR: 0.601, 95% CI: 0.434-0.824, P=0.002). In addition, age (OR: 1.032, 95% CI: 1.018-1.046), COPD (OR: 1.792, 95% CI: 1.196-2.686), and FEV1(OR: 0.205, 95% CI: 0.125-0.339) were also independent predictors of PPCs. Conclusion Implementation of an ERAS pathway shows improved postoperative outcomes, including shortened LOS, lower in-hospital costs, and reduced occurrence of PPCs, providing benefits to the postoperative recovery of patients with lung cancer undergoing surgical treatment.

scholarly journals Current situation and consideration on the enhanced recovery protocols in lung cancer surgery

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (S33) ◽  
pp. S3855-S3858 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shuangjiang Li ◽  
Guowei Che ◽  
Cheng Shen ◽  
Kun Zhou
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Lung Cancer Surgery ◽  
Current Situation ◽  
Cancer Surgery ◽  
Recovery Protocols

scholarly journals Influence of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) on patients receiving lung resection: a retrospective study of 1,749 cases

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chunmei Wang ◽  
Yutian Lai ◽  
Pengfei Li ◽  
Jianhua Su ◽  
Guowei Che
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Logistic Regression ◽  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery ◽  
Lung Resection ◽  
Hospital Costs ◽  
Lung Cancer Surgery ◽  
Pulmonary Complications ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Postoperative Pulmonary Complications

Abstract Background The study aimed to evaluate the outcomes following the implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) for patients undergoing lung cancer surgery.Method A retrospective cohort study involving 1,749 patients with lung cancer undergoing pulmonary resection was conducted. The patients were divided into two time period groups for analysis (routine pathway and ERAS pathway). Logistic regression analysis was performed to assess the risks of developing postoperative pulmonary complications.Results Among the 1,749 patients, 691 were stratified into the ERAS group, and 1,058 in to the routine group. The ERAS group presented with shorter postoperative in-hospital length of stay (LOS) (4.0 vs 6.0, P<0.001), total LOS (10.0 VS. 13.0 days, P<0.001), and lower total in-hospital costs (P<0.001), including material (P<0.001) and drug expenses (P<0.001). Furthermore, the ERAS group also presented with a lower occurrence of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) than the routine group (15.2% vs. 19.5%, P=0.022). Likewise, a significantly lower occurrence of pneumonia (8.4% vs. 14.2%, P<0.001) and atelectasis (5.9% vs. 9.8%, P=0.004) was found in the ERAS group. Regarding the binary logistic regression, the ERAS intervention was the sole independent factor for the occurrence of PPCs (OR: 0.601, 95% CI: 0.434-0.824, P=0.002). In addition, age (OR: 1.032, 95% CI: 1.018-1.046), COPD (OR: 1.792, 95% CI: 1.196-2.686), and FEV1(OR: 0.205, 95% CI: 0.125-0.339) were also independent predictors of PPCs. Conclusion Implementation of an ERAS pathway shows improved postoperative outcomes, including shortened LOS, lower in-hospital costs, and reduced occurrence of PPCs, providing benefits to the postoperative recovery of patients with lung cancer undergoing surgical treatment.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document