Evidence for Large New Madrid Earthquakes about A.D. 0 and 1050 B.C., Central United States

2019 ◽  
Vol 90 (3) ◽  
pp. 1393-1406 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martitia P. Tuttle ◽  
Lorraine W. Wolf ◽  
Mary Evelyn Starr ◽  
Pilar Villamor ◽  
Robert H. Lafferty ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 105 (4) ◽  
pp. 1961-1988 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leonardo Ramirez‐Guzman ◽  
Robert W. Graves ◽  
Kim B. Olsen ◽  
Oliver S. Boyd ◽  
Chris Cramer ◽  
...  


Author(s):  
Susan Elizabeth Hough ◽  
Roger G. Bilham

When the 1811–1812 New Madrid earthquakes rocked the North American midcontinent, the state of seismology as a modern field of inquiry matched that of the United States as a country: a few steps beyond a collection of struggling colonies but still very much a work in progress. Inevitably the New Madrid earthquakes caught the attention of some of the best and most scientifically trained individuals who experienced the remarkable sequence. Jared Brooks, Daniel Drake, Samuel Mitchell—all endeavored to document their observations, and other data, in a thorough and scientific manner, and all had some awareness of theories of the day. Yet in retrospect, contemporary investigation of the sequence remained limited and fragmented. The response would be very different when the Charleston, South Carolina, earthquake rocked the central United States toward the end of the 19th century. Although still too early to be recorded on seismometers, the Charleston earthquake was investigated in a manner that the present-day earth scientist would consider modern. Within the United States, the New Madrid sequence and the Charleston earthquake form a pair of 19th-century bookends. On the shelf in between these milestone events was the emergence of seismology as a modern science—developments that, for the most part, took place outside of the United States. The field would not mature fully during the span of this single century, of course. Elastic rebound theory, the fundamental tenet that has lent its name to this book, would not appear as a fully realized theory until shortly after the 1906 San Francisco earthquake. Plate tectonics, which at long last explained the engine behind the earthquake machine, would arrive on the scene later still. But it was during the 19th century that scientists first began to build the very foundations of the field. As earlier chapters have discussed, intelligent speculations about earthquakes date back at least as far as Aristotle’s time; intelligent, thorough observations of earthquakes date back to the mid-18th century, in particular the efforts sparked by the Year of the Earthquakes in England (1750) and the Lisbon earthquake five years later.



1999 ◽  
Author(s):  
S.E. Hough ◽  
J.G. Armbruster ◽  
Leonardo Seeber ◽  
J.F. Hough


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Renee M. Reichenbacher ◽  
◽  
Valarie Harrison ◽  
Taylor Andrew Weathers ◽  
Roy B. Van Arsdale ◽  
...  


Author(s):  
Susan Elizabeth Hough ◽  
Roger G. Bilham

Like any proper mystery, the tale of the New Madrid earthquakes begins on a note of intrigue. According to legend, the earthquakes were predicted—even prophesied—by the great Shawnee leader and statesman Tecumseh. Concerned over continued encroachment of white settlers onto Indian lands in the mid continent, Tecumseh traveled widely throughout the central United States in the early 1800s, striving to unite diverse tribes to stand against further land cessions. According to legend, Tecumseh told his mostly Creek followers at Tuckabatchee, Alabama, that he had proof of the Great Spirit’s wrath. The sign blazed across the heavens for all to see—the great comet of 1811, a dazzling and mysterious sight. As if to emphasize Tecumseh’s words, the comet grew in brilliance through October, dimming in the night time sky in November just as Tecumseh left Tuckabatchee for points northward. Also according to legend, Tecumseh’s speech at Tuckabatchee told of an even more dramatic sign yet to come. In an oration delivered to hundreds of listeners, the leader reportedly told the crowd, “You do not believe the Great Spirit has sent me. You shall know. I leave Tuckabatchee directly, and shall go straight to Detroit. When I arrive there, I will stamp on the ground with my foot and shake down every house in Tuckabatchee.” The Creeks counted the days until the one calculated to mark Tecumseh’s return, and on that day— December 16, 1811—the first of the great New Madrid earthquakes struck, destroying all of the houses in Tuckabatchee. Tecumseh’s Prophecy, as it has come to be known, strikes a chord with those inclined to see Spirit and earth as intertwined. But it can also capture the imagination of those who see phenomena such as earthquakes as the exclusive purview of science. What if Tecumseh’s Prophecy was born not of communication with the Great Spirit, but instead of an ability to recognize signs from the earth itself? According to the renowned English geologist Sir Charles Lyell, Native American oral traditions told of devastating earthquakes in the New Madrid region prior to 1811.



Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document