scholarly journals Action Research on the Collaborative Process of Reflection through Instructional Maturity

2017 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 49-78 ◽  
Author(s):  
정민수
2020 ◽  
pp. 1-15
Author(s):  
Cathal O’Siochru ◽  
Lin Norton ◽  
Ruth Pilkington ◽  
Elizabeth Parr ◽  
Babs Anderson ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-3
Author(s):  
Bibi Hølge-Hazelton ◽  
◽  
Thora Grothe Thomsen ◽  
Mette Kjerhol ◽  
Elizabeth Rosted ◽  
...  

The experience of a collaborative process to build a research and development culture at a new university hospital underlined that the Person-centred Practice Framework (McCance and McCormack, 2017) forms a solid and valuable foundation for ongoing work. The fact that the process has involved researchers, leaders at different levels, clinical nurse specialists and other healthcare professionals makes the framework’s focus on the whole care environment especially relevant. How work towards a nursing research culture developed into a person-centred strategy In 2010, the management at our hospital in Denmark established a director of nursing research position, with a remit to create, develop and support a research culture within the nursing and allied health professions. No guidance was offered on how this should be done and as a consequence the ideas and professional profile of the person hired were highly influential (Hølge-Hazelton, 2019). Having a solid background in action research and studies of vocational and professional education, the new director launched a collaborative process to identify the desired characteristics of the research culture. Those contributing included the networks of clinical development nurses and head nurses, and the executive director of nursing. The proposed vision that emerged was: Our research culture should be constructive, creative, inclusive and visible at all levels of the hospital. This vision was discussed and agreed among all head nurses at the hospital. The idea was that the culture should be everybody’s business and include all levels of nursing, and furthermore that these levels would be interdependent and dynamic. The strategy to achieve this was defined as ‘bottom up, top down and don’t forget the middle’, to signal that research and development are closely related and that they should be participatory, based on a broad understanding of evidence (Rycroft-Malone, 2010), clinically relevant, and supported by the hospital’s leadership. Within the first years of work towards realising the vision, two more nursing researchers were hired in clinical departments at the hospital. They also had a background in personal and organisational learning processes, organisational development and action research. Their task was to support the realisation of the strategy at departmental and unit level.


1998 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 178-188 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ann P. Turnbull ◽  
Barbara J. Friesen ◽  
Carmen Ramirez

We discuss a participatory action research (PAR) approach to conducting family research. We conceptualize participatory action research as a collaborative process among researchers and stakeholders throughout the entire research sequence. Based on our five years of implementing PAR, we describe potential PAR advantages and challenges that need to be documented in future research. We propose a model of PAR implementation levels including the options of family members as research leaders and researchers as ongoing advisors, researchers and family members as coresearchers, and researchers as leaders, and family members as ongoing advisors. Finally, we discuss key implementation issues (i.e., defining stakeholders to include in the PAR process, maximizing benefits and minimizing drawbacks of diverse expertise, and addressing logistical considerations) with suggestions for effectively addressing them.


2021 ◽  
pp. 147675032110231
Author(s):  
Terah J Stewart

An overarching component of PAR is that there should be participant engagement between researchers and other participants as members of a/the community under inquiry. This expectation while powerful, can also prove to be prohibitive for studies seeking to engage communities with stigmatized and/or criminalized identities, which was the case as I sought to engage a PAR methodology with college student sex workers. As such, along with study collaborators, we imagine and develop a power-conscious collaborative process that is useful for researchers wishing to embrace a collaborative ethic, when the community component of PAR might be unsuitable or unattainable. Specifically, this process creates conditions whereby the researcher can be cognizant of power relations and disrupt the prevalent researcher/researched dichotomy and more deeply invite subjects of research to become collaborators and share power within the inquiry.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document