scholarly journals Clinical observations of COVID-19 infection in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension

Kardiologiia ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 61 (6) ◽  
pp. 28-34
Author(s):  
O. V. Kamenskaya ◽  
I. Yu. Loginova ◽  
A. S. Klinkova ◽  
V. V. Lomivorotov ◽  
A. M. Chernyavsky

Aim    To present clinical observations of the novel coronavirus infection (COVID-19) in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) after a surgical intervention in the form of thromobendarterectomy from pulmonary artery branches.Material and methods    The Acad. E.N. Meshalkin National Medical Research Center performed 127 open surgical interventions for CTEPH in the form of thromobendarterectomy from 2016 through 2020. The present study enrolled 113 patients included into the follow-up care group and into the Center Registry who were followed up for more than 6 months after the surgery. Clinical and functional features of COVID-19 were evaluated in the studied group.Results    In the follow-up care group, 5 (4.4%) postoperative CTEPH patients had COVID-19. One patient had asymptomatic disease, and others had typical clinical symptoms and bilateral polysegmental pneumonia. There were no cases requiring artificial ventilation and no lethal outcomes. All patients with COVID-19 received anticoagulants as a basis therapy for CTEPH, and two patients who had residual pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) additionally received a PAH-specific therapy. During the treatment of COVID-19, no adjustment of the anticoagulant or PAH-specific therapy was required.Conclusion    The group of patients with CTEPH is a unique pathophysiological model for studying the effect of COVID-19 under the conditions of compromised pulmonary circulation. In the studied follow-up care group, the COVID-19 morbidity was 4.4 % without fatal outcomes. Evaluation of the role of chronic anticoagulant and PAH-specific therapy in COVID-19 postoperative patients as well as evaluation of the role of COVID-19 in CTEPH progression merit further investigation. 

2007 ◽  
Vol 101 (11) ◽  
pp. 2254-2262 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jay Suntharalingam ◽  
Kimberley Goldsmith ◽  
Mark Toshner ◽  
Natalie Doughty ◽  
Karen K. Sheares ◽  
...  

CHEST Journal ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 143 (4) ◽  
pp. 1070-1077 ◽  
Author(s):  
Toshihiko Sugiura ◽  
Nobuhiro Tanabe ◽  
Yukiko Matsuura ◽  
Ayako Shigeta ◽  
Naoko Kawata ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 51 (4) ◽  
pp. 1702576 ◽  
Author(s):  
Remedios Otero ◽  
Laurent Bertoletti ◽  
Alfonso Muriel ◽  
Carmine Siniscalchi ◽  
Carmen Jimenez ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 4006-4006
Author(s):  
Franco Piovella ◽  
Andrea M. D’Armini ◽  
Marisa Barone ◽  
Vincenzo Emmi ◽  
Chiara Beltrametti ◽  
...  

Abstract Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is a rare disease which results from obstruction of the major pulmonary arteries by incompletely resolved or organized pulmonary emboli which have become incorporated into the pulmonary artery wall, eventually causing an increase in pulmonary vascular resistances. Pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) is the treatment of choice. Careful pre- and post-operative management is essential for a successful outcome following PEA. In 1994, we started in Pavia a program in which members of a multidisciplinary team work in close interaction with the aim of increase experience in the challenging problems these patients present in the evaluative, surgical, and post-operative phases of their care. So far, 134 PEAs have been performed. Preoperatively, New York Heart Association (NYHA) class distribution was respectively 3-II, 56-III, and 75-IV; mean pulmonary artery pressure and pulmonary vascular resistances were 47 ± 13 mmHg and 1149 ± 535 dynes/sec/cm−5 respectively. The overall operative mortality has been 9.7% (in 2005 mortality rate was 4.5%). At present, 92% of the PEA patients are actively participating in the follow-up study. Follow-up visits are at 3 months after PEA, yearly for the following 5 years, and then at 7, 10, and 15 years postoperatively. Both early and late survivals were excellent. Survival rate at 3 months, 1 year, and 3 years were respectively of 89.5±2.7%, 87.3±3.0%, and 82.7±3.6%. Survival rates had not changed at 5, 7, and 10 years postoperative. Three months after PEA, 29 (58%) subjects were within NYHA class I, 18 (36%) in class II, and 3 (6%) in class III. At 1-year follow-up, 40 (80%) patients were within NYHA class I, 10 (20%) in class II. A statistically significant difference exists not only between the preoperative and the postoperative data (p <0.0001), but also between the functional status at 3 months and the other two postoperative controls (p <0.001). Table summarizes the results of hemodynamic tests collected at three months, one year and three years on the first 35 patients who completed the follow-up program. Hemodynamic data from 35 patients participating to the Pavia Pulmonary Endarterectomy Program with complete 3-year follow-up. CVP mPAP CO CI PVR PVRI CVP (mmHg) central venous pressure; mPAP (mmHg) mean pulmonary artery pressure; CO (L/min) cardiac output; CI (L/min/m2) cardiac index; PVR (dynes/sec/cm-5) pulmonary vascular resistances; PVRI (dynes/sec/cm-5/m2) pulmonary vascular resistances index; RV-EF (%) right ventricle ejection fraction. RV-EF A: Before-PEA 7±6 48±12 3.3±0.9 1.8±0.5 1125±412 2027±731 15±8 B:Before discharge 5±4 25±10 5.2±1.1 2.9±0.5 289±142 505±234 32±8 C: 3 months 2±2 24±11 5.1±1.4 2.8±0.6 231±198 542±271 32±7 D: 1 year 1±2 23±12 5.0±1.1 2.7±0.6 290±191 531±343 35±8 E: 3 years 2±2 24±12 4.9±1.1 2.6±0.5 317±226 579±393 34±8 p value A vs. B: nsA vs. C, D, and E: <0.0001B vs. C, D and E: <0.05 A vs. B, C, D and E: <0.0001 A vs. B, C, D and E: <0.0001 A vs. B, C, D and E: <0.0001 A vs. B, C, D and E: <0.0001 A vs. B, C, D and E: <0.0001 A vs. B, C, D and E:


2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
A R Pereira ◽  
R Cale ◽  
F Ferreira ◽  
S Alegria ◽  
S Sebaiti ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) has emerged as a therapeutic option for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) considered ineligible for pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA). The initial publications showed very good short-term outcomes for the technique, but there are limited data regarding medium-term outcomes and its comparison with optimal medical treatment (OMT). Objectives To evaluate and compare the medium-term outcomes of OMT versus (vs) BPA in inoperable CTEPH. Methods Retrospective study of consecutive patients (pts) with CTEPH followed in a referral centre for Pulmonary Hypertension. Selected those pts considered ineligible for PEA and with at least 2 years of follow-up. Comparison between two treatment strategies: OMT alone [maximum tolerated doses of pulmonary vasodilator drugs (PVD), as indicated] vs BPA (pts who completed the program with or without OMT). Endpoint was a composite of all-cause death and unplanned right heart failure admission at 2-year. Results From 62 pts, 19 pts were included (11 pts were excluded due to recent diagnosis; 32 were submitted to EAP): mean age 65.0±15.3 years, 89.5% female. At diagnosis, all pts had functional capacity limitation and elevated serum NTproBNP levels (median value 1255.0 pg/mL). Mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP) was 46.2±9.3 mmHg and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) 15.3±8.3 Wood units (WU). Concerning treatment, 12 pts (63.2%) underwent OMT alone. These pts had higher NTproBNP levels (2670.0 vs 538.0 pg/mL, p&lt;0.01) and PVR values (19.7±7.6 vs 9.7±5.4 WU, p=0.01) and lower CI (1.6±0.3 vs 2.4±0.5 L/min/m2, p&lt;0.01), at baseline; the remaining basal features didn't differ among groups (Fig.A). At 2-year follow-up, pts submitted to BPA were under PVD in 71.4% of cases with a mean of 1±0.8 drugs per patient and no difference compared to OMT group (83.3%, 1.7±0.9 drugs per patient), although oxygen therapy was higher in medical group (50% vs 0%, p=0.04). A significant overall improvement was observed in BPA group (Table – A): all pts were in functional class I (p&lt;0.01), no one had right ventricular dysfunction (p&lt;0.01) and mPAP decreased to 25.1±6.7 mmHg (p=0.01) and RVP to 2.9±0.8 WU (p=0.01). Inversely, no change was observed in pts under OMT alone (p&gt;0.05 in all, Table – A). Endpoint rate was 31.6% with all adverse events occurring in the OMT group (50% vs 0%, p=0.04). After adjustment by Cox regression, no difference in baseline or follow-up features besides treatment influenced the outcome. Kaplan-Meier analysis (Graphic – B) confirmed significant benefit of BPA in 2-year outcome occurrence (long rank 4.6, p=0.03). Conclusions BPA strategy seems to improve medium-term functional capacity, right ventricular function and haemodynamics and decrease oxygen therapy dependence in inoperable CTEPH. Pts under OMT alone have a poor prognosis. These data encourage the development and implementation of the technique for inoperable CTEPH. FUNDunding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document